Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38611666›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advancing Dermatological Diagnostics: Interpretable AI for Enhanced Skin Lesion Classification.

Carlo Metta, Andrea Beretta, Riccardo Guidotti, Yuan Yin, Patrick Gallinari, Salvatore Rinzivillo, Fosca Giannotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlo MettaInstitute of Information Science and Technologies (ISTI-CNR), 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-8232
Andrea BerettaInstitute of Information Science and Technologies (ISTI-CNR), 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Riccardo GuidottiDepartment of Computer Science, Universitá di Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Yuan YinLaboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, Italy.
Patrick GallinariLaboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, Italy.
Salvatore RinzivilloInstitute of Information Science and Technologies (ISTI-CNR), 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4404-4147
Fosca GiannottiFaculty of Sciences, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, 56126 Paris, Italy.

Funding

CREXDATA 101092749ERC-2018-ADG XAI 834756FAIR IR0000013HumanE AI Net 952026SoBigData++ 871042TAILOR 952215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial challenge in critical settings like medical diagnosis is making deep learning models used in decision-making systems interpretable. Efforts in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) are underway to address this challenge. Yet, many XAI methods are evaluated on broad classifiers and fail to address complex, real-world issues, such as medical diagnosis. In our study, we focus on enhancing user trust and confidence in automated AI decision-making systems, particularly for diagnosing skin lesions, by tailoring an XAI method to explain an AI model's ability to identify various skin lesion types. We generate explanations using synthetic images of skin lesions as examples and counterexamples, offering a method for practitioners to pinpoint the critical features influencing the classification outcome. A validation survey involving domain experts, novices, and laypersons has demonstrated that explanations increase trust and confidence in the automated decision system. Furthermore, our exploration of the model's latent space reveals clear separations among the most common skin lesion classes, a distinction that likely arises from the unique characteristics of each class and could assist in correcting frequent misdiagnoses by human professionals.

Indexed as

adversial autoecnodersAI in healthcaredermoscopic imagesExplainable Artificial Intelligenceskin image analysis

Identifiers

PMID38611666
PMCPMC11011805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.