ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Radiomics Features in Predicting Human Papillomavirus Status in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review, Quality Appraisal, and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Radiogenomic Imaging in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer: Clinical and Radiologic Characteristics.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026Review
- Radiomic-Based Machine Learning Classifiers for HPV Status Prediction in Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of radiomics features in predicting HPV status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) compared to routine paraclinical measures used in clinical practice. Twenty-six articles were included in the systematic review, and thirteen were used for the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity of the included studies was 0.78, the overall specificity was 0.76, and the overall area under the ROC curve was 0.84. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) equaled 12 (8, 17). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference between radiomics features extracted from CT or MR images. Overall, the studies were of low quality in regard to radiomics quality score, although most had a low risk of bias based on the QUADAS-2 tool. Radiomics features showed good overall sensitivity and specificity in determining HPV status in OPSCC, though the low quality of the included studies poses problems for generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.