Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38611632›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model for Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis Using Computed Tomography.

Stefanie Bette, Luca Canalini, Laura-Marie Feitelson, Piotr Woźnicki, Franka Risch, Adrian Huber, Josua A Decker, Kartikay Tehlan, Judith Becker, Claudia Wollny and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie BetteClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Luca CanaliniClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Laura-Marie FeitelsonClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Piotr WoźnickiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9437-3785
Franka RischClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Adrian HuberClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Josua A DeckerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6876-1373
Kartikay TehlanClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Judith BeckerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5159-5751
Claudia WollnyClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Christian Scheurig-MünklerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Thomas WendlerClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-0510
Florian SchwarzCentre for Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Therapy, Donau-Isar-Klinikum, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany.
Thomas KroenckeClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-1036
University Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DEKlinik Donaustauf · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Augsburg University Project funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the early diagnostic workup of acute pancreatitis (AP), the role of contrast-enhanced CT is to establish the diagnosis in uncertain cases, assess severity, and detect potential complications like necrosis, fluid collections, bleeding or portal vein thrombosis. The value of texture analysis/radiomics of medical images has rapidly increased during the past decade, and the main focus has been on oncological imaging and tumor classification. Previous studies assessed the value of radiomics for differentiating between malignancies and inflammatory diseases of the pancreas as well as for prediction of AP severity. The aim of our study was to evaluate an automatic machine learning model for AP detection using radiomics analysis. Patients with abdominal pain and contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen in an emergency setting were retrospectively included in this single-center study. The pancreas was automatically segmented using TotalSegmentator and radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics. We performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering and applied the random-forest based Boruta model to select the most important radiomics features. Important features and lipase levels were included in a logistic regression model with AP as the dependent variable. The model was established in a training cohort using fivefold cross-validation and applied to the test cohort (80/20 split). From a total of 1012 patients, 137 patients with AP and 138 patients without AP were included in the final study cohort. Feature selection confirmed 28 important features (mainly shape and first-order features) for the differentiation between AP and controls. The logistic regression model showed excellent diagnostic accuracy of radiomics features for the detection of AP, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.932. Using lipase levels only, an AUC of 0.946 was observed. Using both radiomics features and lipase levels, we showed an excellent AUC of 0.933 for the detection of AP. Automated segmentation of the pancreas and consecutive radiomics analysis almost achieved the high diagnostic accuracy of lipase levels, a well-established predictor of AP, and might be considered an additional diagnostic tool in unclear cases. This study provides scientific evidence that automated image analysis of the pancreas achieves comparable diagnostic accuracy to lipase levels and might therefore be used in the future in the rapidly growing era of AI-based image analysis.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitisartificial intelligenceclassificationCTradiomicssegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38611632
PMCPMC11011980
OpenAlexW4393253987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.