Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38611586›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Ovarian Morphology in Non-Hirsute, Normo-Androgenic, Eumenorrheic Premenopausal Women from a Multi-Ethnic Unselected Siberian Population.

Ludmila Lazareva, Larisa Suturina, Alina Atalyan, Irina Danusevich, Iana Nadelyaeva, Lilia Belenkaya, Irina Egorova, Kseniia Ievleva, Natalia Babaeva, Daria Lizneva and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05194384 (Eastern Siberia PCOS Epidemiology & Phenotype Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05194384 completednot on this map

Eastern Siberia PCOS Epidemiology & Phenotype Study (ESPEP Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorFederal State Public Scientific Institution, Scientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction ProblemsRan2016 to 2019Enrolled1,148ConditionsPCOS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ludmila LazarevaScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7662-8529
Larisa SuturinaScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6271-7803
Alina AtalyanScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3407-9365
Irina DanusevichScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.
Iana NadelyaevaScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.
Lilia BelenkayaScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.
Irina EgorovaScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.
Kseniia IevlevaScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.
Natalia BabaevaScientific Center for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems, 664003 Irkutsk, Russia.
Daria LiznevaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Richard S LegroPenn State College of Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Ricardo AzzizHeersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Education of Russian Federation 121022500180-6Ministry of Science and Education of Russian Federation АААА-А18-118011990043-5Ministry of Science and Education of Russian Federation АААА-А19-119101590007-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a highly prevalent disorder in women, and its diagnosis rests on three principal features: ovulatory/menstrual dysfunction, clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM). Currently, data on age- and ethnicity-dependent features of PCOM remain insufficient. We aimed to estimate ethnicity- and age-dependent differences in ovarian volume (OV) and follicle number per ovary (FNPO) in a healthy, medically unbiased population of Caucasian and Asian premenopausal women, who participated in the cross-sectional Eastern Siberia PCOS epidemiology and phenotype (ESPEP) study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05194384) in 2016-2019. The study population consisted of 408 non-hirsute, normo-androgenic, eumenorrheic premenopausal women aged 18-44 years. All participants underwent a uniform evaluation including a review of their medical history and a physical examination, blood sampling, and pelvic ultrasonography. The statistical analysis included non-parametric tests and the estimation of the upper normal limits (UNLs) by 98th percentiles for OV and FNPO. In the total study population, the upper OV percentiles did not differ by ethnicity or age group. By contrast, the UNL of FNPO was higher in Caucasian women than in Asian women, and women aged <35 years demonstrated a higher UNL of FNPO compared to older women. In summary, these data suggest that the estimation of FNPO, but not OV, should take into account the ethnicity and age of the individual in estimating the presence of PCOM.

Indexed as

FNPOfollicle number per ovaryhealthy populationovarian volumePCOMpelvic ultrasoundUNLupper normal limits

Identifiers

PMID38611586
PMCPMC11012196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.