ArticleCancers2024
Clinical [
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging the hallmarks of cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Specific PET Imaging for Precision Management of Lung Cancer: Advances, Clinical Translation and Future Directions.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Ferroptosis in renal cell carcinoma: integrative multi-omics insights and therapeutic perspectives.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Astatine-211-Labeled Therapy Targeting Amino Acid Transporters: Overcoming Drug Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Hypoxia Imaging in Lung Cancer: A PET-Based Narrative Review for Clinicians and Researchers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Compact and cGMP-compliant automated synthesis of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025Article
- The implication of aberrant NRF2 activation in management of female cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- [Npj imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background(4
methodsThis retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data compared [
resultsThe mean administered activity of [
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.