Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38611073›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Clinical Relevance of Physical Function Outcomes in Cancer Cachexia.

Lucas Caeiro, Sofia Jaramillo Quiroz, Jenna S Hegarty, Ellen Grewe, Jose M Garcia, Lindsey J Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucas CaeiroGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9633-3384
Sofia Jaramillo QuirozGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
Jenna S HegartyGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3813-0916
Ellen GreweGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
Jose M GarciaGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
Lindsey J AndersonGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3810-2427
University of Puget Sound · US

Funding

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Training ProgramT32DK007247 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GREGORY J MORTON, KRISTINA Marie UTZSCHNEIDER · 1986 to 2026
$10.0M
Nutrition, Obesity and Atherosclerosis Training ProgramT32HL007028 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Karin E Bornfeldt · 1985 to 2026
$6.4M
Improving cancer-related fatigue, sexual dysfunction and quality of life in older men with cancer and androgen deficiencyR01AG061558 · NIA · SEATTLE INST FOR BIOMEDICAL/CLINICAL RES · PI BASARIA, SHEHZAD, DEL FABBRO, EGIDIO · 2019 to 2025
$3.4M
Improving Patient-Important Outcomes with Testosterone Replacement in Hypogonadal Men with a Prior History of CancerR01CA239208 · NCI · SEATTLE INST FOR BIOMEDICAL/CLINICAL RES · PI BASARIA, SHEHZAD, GARCIA, JOSE M. · 2019 to 2025
$3.3M
The Role of Ghrelin and the GHSR-1a receptor in Sarcopenic ObesityI01BX002807 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI GARCIA, JOSE M. · 2016 to 2025
–
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for physical function maintenance during hematopoietic stem cell transplantationIK2RX003245 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI Lindsey Anderson · 2020 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002807NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239208NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007028NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061558NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007247RRD VA IK2 RX003245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing clinical manifestations of cancer/treatment burden on functional status and quality of life remains paramount across the cancer trajectory, particularly for patients with cachexia who display reduced functional capacity. However, clinically relevant criteria for classifying functional impairment at a single point in time or for classifying meaningful functional changes subsequent to disease and/or treatment progression are lacking. This unmet clinical need remains a major obstacle to the development of therapies for cancer cachexia. This review aims to describe current literature-based evidence for clinically meaningful criteria for (1) functional impairment at a single timepoint between cancer patients with or without cachexia and (2) changes in physical function over time across interventional studies conducted in patients with cancer cachexia. The most common functional assessment in cross-sectional and interventional studies was hand grip strength (HGS). We observed suggestive evidence that an HGS deficit between 3 and 6 kg in cancer cachexia may display clinical relevance. In interventional studies, we observed that long-duration multimodal therapies with a focus on skeletal muscle may benefit HGS in patients with considerable weight loss. Future studies should derive cohort-specific clinically relevant criteria to confirm these observations in addition to other functional outcomes and investigate appropriate patient-reported anchors.

Indexed as

cancer cachexiagait speedhand grip strengthminimal clinically important differenceminimal important changeminimal important differencephysical functionquality of lifesix-minute walk teststair climb power

Identifiers

PMID38611073
PMCPMC11010860
OpenAlexW4393482619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.