Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38611071›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Dexamethasone in Patients with Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Pierre Scheffler, Christian Fung, Shahan Momjian, Dominik Koessinger, Levin Häni, Nicolas Neidert, Jakob Straehle, Florian Volz, Oliver Schnell, Jürgen Beck and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuropalliative care in brain cancer.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Metabolism of myeloid cells in brain tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pierre SchefflerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Christian FungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Shahan MomjianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Dominik KoessingerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-9323
Levin HäniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7892-7138
Nicolas NeidertDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Jakob StraehleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Florian VolzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7274-519X
Oliver SchnellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.
Jürgen BeckDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7687-6098
Amir El RahalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79098 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8250-5883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlioblastomas are the most common primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Although modern management strategies have modestly improved overall survival, the prognosis remains dismal, with treatment side effects often impinging on the clinical course. Glioblastomas cause neurological dysfunction by infiltrating CNS tissue and via perifocal oedema formation. The administration of steroids such as dexamethasone is thought to alleviate symptoms by reducing oedema. However, despite its widespread use, the evidence for the administration of dexamethasone is limited and conflicting. Therefore, we aimed to review the current evidence concerning the use and outcomes of dexamethasone in patients with glioblastoma.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA-P guidelines. We performed a restricted search using the keywords "Dexamethasone" and "Glioblastoma" on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Academic Search Premier. We included studies reporting on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma patients receiving higher or lower dexamethasone doses. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. We performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model for OS and PFS.

resultsTwenty-two retrospective studies were included. Higher doses of dexamethasone were associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio 1.62, confidence interval 1.40-1.88) and PFS (1.49, 1.23-1.81). OS remained worse even when studies corrected for clinical status (1.52, 1.38-1.67).

conclusionDespite the widespread use of dexamethasone in glioblastoma patients, its use is correlated with worse long-term outcomes. Consequently, Dexamethasone administration should be restricted to selected symptomatic patients. Future prospective studies are crucial to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

complicationsdexamethasonedosingevidence-basedglioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID38611071
PMCPMC11011080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.