ArticleCancers2024
Identification of Interpretable Clusters and Associated Signatures in Breast Cancer Single-Cell Data: A Topic Modeling Approach.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic clustering alignment and feature characterization for single-cell omics using ACE-OF-Clust.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the latent space of transcriptomic data with topic modeling.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Topic modeling analysis of the Allen Human Brain Atlas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characterization of holins, the membrane proteins of coliphage ASEC2201: a genomewideFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Topic modeling is a popular technique in machine learning and natural language processing, where a corpus of text documents is classified into themes or topics using word frequency analysis. This approach has proven successful in various biological data analysis applications, such as predicting cancer subtypes with high accuracy and identifying genes, enhancers, and stable cell types simultaneously from sparse single-cell epigenomics data. The advantage of using a topic model is that it not only serves as a clustering algorithm, but it can also explain clustering results by providing word probability distributions over topics. Our study proposes a novel topic modeling approach for clustering single cells and detecting topics (gene signatures) in single-cell datasets that measure multiple omics simultaneously. We applied this approach to examine the transcriptional heterogeneity of luminal and triple-negative breast cancer cells using patient-derived xenograft models with acquired resistance to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Through this approach, we identified protein-coding genes and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that group thousands of cells into biologically similar clusters, accurately distinguishing drug-sensitive and -resistant breast cancer types. In comparison to standard state-of-the-art clustering analyses, our approach offers an optimal partitioning of genes into topics and cells into clusters simultaneously, producing easily interpretable clustering outcomes. Additionally, we demonstrate that an integrative clustering approach, which combines the information from mRNAs and lncRNAs treated as disjoint omics layers, enhances the accuracy of cell classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.