Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610911›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

The Contribution of Proteomics in Understanding Endometrial Protein Expression in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure.

Anastasios Potiris, Eleni Alyfanti, Eirini Drakaki, Despoina Mavrogianni, Theodoros Karampitsakos, Pavlos Machairoudias, Spyridon Topis, Athanasios Zikopoulos, Chara Skentou, Periklis Panagopoulos and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Histochemical Assessment of Reticulin-Collagen Patterns in the Mid-Secretory Endometrium Predicts Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anastasios PotirisThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-1521
Eleni AlyfantiThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Eirini DrakakiFirst Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Despoina MavrogianniFirst Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece.
Theodoros KarampitsakosThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Pavlos MachairoudiasThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Spyridon TopisThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Athanasios ZikopoulosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Treliske, Truro TR1 3LQ, UK.
Chara SkentouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of the University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Periklis PanagopoulosThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Peter DrakakisThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Sofoklis StavrosThird Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRoyal Cornwall Hospital · GBUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) poses a significant challenge in assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes. The endometrium plays a crucial role in embryo implantation, and its protein expression profile is integral in determining receptivity. Proteomics has emerged as a valuable tool in unraveling the molecular intricacies underlying endometrial receptivity and RIF. The aim of the present review is to analyze the contribution of proteomics to the understanding of endometrial protein expression in women with RIF, based on the results of significant proteomic studies. Medline/Pubmed databases were searched using keywords pertaining to proteomics combined with terms related to RIF. 15 studies were included in the present review. Several proteins have been found to exbibit differential expression in endometrial biopsies and fluid samples between fertile women and women with RIF during the receptive endometrial phase. The profile of endometrial proteins varied significantly among the studies. Nevertheless, similar changes in the expression levels of annexin-6, progesterone receptor, MMP-2, and MMP-9 in the endometrium of women with RIF, were found in more than one study indicating that certain proteins could potentially be effective biomarkers of endometrial receptivity. Proteomics contributes significantly to the understanding of protein expression in the endometrium of women with RIF and the analysis of proteins in endometrial fluid are promising for improving the clinical management of RIF.

Indexed as

biomarkersendometrial protein expressionendometrial receptivityproteomicsrecurrent implantation failure (RIF)

Identifiers

PMID38610911
PMCPMC11012239
OpenAlexW4394567065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.