Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610741›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Practice Guidelines for Monitoring Neuromuscular Blockade-Elements to Change to Increase the Quality of Anesthesiological Procedures and How to Improve the Acceleromyographic Method.

Urszula Kosciuczuk, Agnieszka Dardzinska, Anna Kasperczuk, Paweł Dzienis, Adam Tomaszuk, Katarzyna Tarnowska, Ewa Rynkiewicz-Szczepanska, Agnieszka Kossakowska, Marta Pryzmont

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Advances in Neuromuscular Monitoring Techniques in Anesthesiology: A 2025 Perspective.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  3. Impact of Liver Disease on Use of Muscle Relaxants in Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Urszula KosciuczukDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Bialystok, Kilinskiego Street 1, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2971-2314
Agnieszka DardzinskaFaculty of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2811-0274
Anna KasperczukFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5919-5346
Paweł DzienisFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.
Adam TomaszukFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3685-6591
Katarzyna TarnowskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Bialystok, Kilinskiego Street 1, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Ewa Rynkiewicz-SzczepanskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Bialystok, Kilinskiego Street 1, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Agnieszka KossakowskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Bialystok, Kilinskiego Street 1, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.
Marta PryzmontDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Bialystok, Kilinskiego Street 1, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromuscular blocking agents are a crucial pharmacological element of general anesthesia. Decades of observations and scientific studies have resulted in the identification of many risks associated with the uncontrolled use of neuromuscular blocking agents during general anesthesia or an incomplete reversal of neuromuscular blockade in the postoperative period. Residual relaxation and acute postoperative respiratory depression are the most serious consequences. Cyclic recommendations have been developed by anesthesiology societies from many European countries as well as from the United States and New Zealand. The newest recommendations from the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the European Society of Anesthesiology were published in 2023. These publications contain very detailed recommendations for monitoring the dosage of skeletal muscle relaxants in the different stages of anesthesia-induction, maintenance and recovery, and the postoperative period. Additionally, there are recommendations for various special situations (for example, rapid sequence induction) and patient populations (for example, those with organ failure, obesity, etc.). The guidelines also refer to pharmacological drugs for reversing the neuromuscular transmission blockade. Despite the development of several editions of recommendations for monitoring neuromuscular blockade, observational and survey data indicate that their practical implementation is very limited. The aim of this review was to present the professional, technical, and technological factors that limit the implementation of these recommendations in order to improve the implementation of the guidelines and increase the quality of anesthesiological procedures and perioperative safety.

Indexed as

acceleromyographyneuromuscular blockneuromuscular monitoringtrain-of-four

Identifiers

PMID38610741
PMCPMC11012245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.