Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610739›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Clinical Patient-Relevant Outcome Domains for Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome-A Scoping Review and Expert Panels.

Ferdinand Bastiaens, Jessica T Wegener, Raymond W J G Ostelo, Bert-Kristian W P van Roosendaal, Kris C P Vissers, Miranda L van Hooff

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ferdinand BastiaensDepartment of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5758-4954
Jessica T WegenerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Raymond W J G OsteloDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7679-7210
Bert-Kristian W P van RoosendaalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kris C P VissersDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2919-6356
Miranda L van HooffDepartment of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5313-6436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large variation exists in the monitoring of clinical outcome domains in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). Furthermore, it is unclear which outcome domains are important from the PSPS patient's perspective. The study objectives were to identify patient-relevant outcome domains for PSPS and to establish a PSPS outcomes framework. PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched to identify studies reporting views or preferences of PSPS patients on outcome domains. The Arksey and O'Malley framework was followed to identify outcome domains. An expert panel rated the domains based on the importance for PSPS patients they have treated. A framework of relevant outcome domains was established using the selected outcome domains by the expert panel. No studies were found for PSPS type 1. Five studies with 77 PSPS type 2 patients were included for further analysis. Fourteen outcome domains were identified. An expert panel, including 27 clinical experts, reached consensus on the domains pain, daily activities, perspective of life, social participation, mobility, mood, self-reliance, and sleep. Eleven domains were included in the PSPS type 2 outcomes framework. This framework is illustrative of a more holistic perspective and should be used to improve the evaluation of care for PSPS type 2 patients. Further research is needed on the prioritization of relevant outcome domains.

Indexed as

expert paneloutcome domainspatient participationpersistent spinal pain syndromescoping review

Identifiers

PMID38610739
PMCPMC11012536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.