Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610576›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Using Computer Vision to Annotate Video-Recoded Direct Observation of Physical Behavior.

Sarah K Keadle, Skylar Eglowski, Katie Ylarregui, Scott J Strath, Julian Martinez, Alex Dekhtyar, Vadim Kagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah K KeadleDepartment of Kinesiology and Public Health, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9569-9306
Skylar EglowskiSentimetrix Inc., Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Katie YlarreguiDepartment of Kinesiology and Public Health, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Scott J StrathCollege of Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53205, USA.
Julian MartinezCollege of Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53205, USA.
Alex DekhtyarDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8340-6396
Vadim KaganSentimetrix Inc., Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

Funding

TOPIC 425: POSTURE ANALYSIS THROUGH MACHINE LEARNING (PATHML) PHASE II75N91023C00031 · NCI · SENTIMETRIX, INC. · PI KAGAN, VADIM · 2023 to 2023
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91023C00031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct observation is a ground-truth measure for physical behavior, but the high cost limits widespread use. The purpose of this study was to develop and test machine learning methods to recognize aspects of physical behavior and location from videos of human movement: Adults (N = 26, aged 18-59 y) were recorded in their natural environment for two, 2- to 3-h sessions. Trained research assistants annotated videos using commercially available software including the following taxonomies: (1) sedentary versus non-sedentary (two classes); (2) activity type (four classes: sedentary, walking, running, and mixed movement); and (3) activity intensity (four classes: sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous). Four machine learning approaches were trained and evaluated for each taxonomy. Models were trained on 80% of the videos, validated on 10%, and final accuracy is reported on the remaining 10% of the videos not used in training. Overall accuracy was as follows: 87.4% for Taxonomy 1, 63.1% for Taxonomy 2, and 68.6% for Taxonomy 3. This study shows it is possible to use computer vision to annotate aspects of physical behavior, speeding up the time and reducing labor required for direct observation. Future research should test these machine learning models on larger, independent datasets and take advantage of analysis of video fragments, rather than individual still images.

Indexed as

ComputersLabor, ObstetricAdultEnvironmentFemaleHumansMachine LearningPregnancySoftwareassessmentcomputer visiondirect observationphysical activitysedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID38610576
PMCPMC11014332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.