Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610546›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluating Bacterial Nanocellulose Interfaces for Recording Surface Biopotentials from Plants.

James Reynolds, Michael Wilkins, Devon Martin, Matthew Taggart, Kristina R Rivera, Meral Tunc-Ozdemir, Thomas Rufty, Edgar Lobaton, Alper Bozkurt, Michael A Daniele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James ReynoldsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8345-685X
Michael WilkinsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Devon MartinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6761-6748
Matthew TaggartDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5976-2638
Kristina R RiveraJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, NC State University and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27695, USA.
Meral Tunc-OzdemirDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Thomas RuftyDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Edgar LobatonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4056-8309
Alper BozkurtDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5538-262X
Michael A DanieleDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2016-4091
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1015796National Science Foundation ECCS-2231012National Science Foundation EF-2319389National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka EEC-1160483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of plant electrophysiology offers promising techniques to track plant health and stress in vivo for both agricultural and environmental monitoring applications. Use of superficial electrodes on the plant body to record surface potentials may provide new phenotyping insights. Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) is a flexible, optically translucent, and water-vapor-permeable material with low manufacturing costs, making it an ideal substrate for non-invasive and non-destructive plant electrodes. This work presents BNC electrodes with screen-printed carbon (graphite) ink-based conductive traces and pads. It investigates the potential of these electrodes for plant surface electrophysiology measurements in comparison to commercially available standard wet gel and needle electrodes. The electrochemically active surface area and impedance of the BNC electrodes varied based on the annealing temperature and time over the ranges of 50 °C to 90 °C and 5 to 60 min, respectively. The water vapor transfer rate and optical transmittance of the BNC substrate were measured to estimate the level of occlusion caused by these surface electrodes on the plant tissue. The total reduction in chlorophyll content under the electrodes was measured after the electrodes were placed on maize leaves for up to 300 h, showing that the BNC caused only a 16% reduction. Maize leaf transpiration was reduced by only 20% under the BNC electrodes after 72 h compared to a 60% reduction under wet gel electrodes in 48 h. On three different model plants, BNC-carbon ink surface electrodes and standard invasive needle electrodes were shown to have a comparable signal quality, with a correlation coefficient of >0.9, when measuring surface biopotentials induced by acute environmental stressors. These are strong indications of the superior performance of the BNC substrate with screen-printed graphite ink as an electrode material for plant surface biopotential recordings.

Indexed as

GraphiteAgricultureBiological TransportCarbonChlorophyllSteamCarbonChlorophyllGraphiteSteamelectrodeelectrophysiologynanocelluloseplant

Identifiers

PMID38610546
PMCPMC11014089
OpenAlexW4394577326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.