Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610465›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Simulation Validation of an 8-Channel Parallel-Transmit Dipole Array on an Infant Phantom: Including RF Losses for Robust Correlation with Experimental Results.

Jérémie Daniel Clément, Özlem Ipek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jérémie Daniel ClémentSystem Technologies, Siemens Healthineers AG, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-8890
Özlem IpekSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9NH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-1600

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT201526/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust WT203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is crucial to demonstrate a robust correlation between the simulated and manufactured parallel-transmit (pTx) arrays performances to release the currently-used, very restrictive safety margins. In this study, we describe the qualitative and quantitative validation of a simulation model with respect to experimental results for an 8-channel dipole array at 7T. An approach that includes the radiofrequency losses into the simulation model is presented and compared to simulation models neglecting these losses. Simulated S-matrices and individual B1+-field maps were compared with experimentally measured quantities. With the proposed approach, an average relative difference of ~1.1% was found between simulated and experimental reflection coefficients, ~4.2% for the 1st coupling terms, and ~9.4% for the 2nd coupling terms. A maximum normalized root-mean-square error of 4.8% was achieved between experimental and simulated individual B1+-field maps. The effectiveness of the simulation model to accurately predict the B1+-field patterns was assessed, qualitatively and quantitatively, through a comparison with experimental data. We conclude that, using the proposed model for radiofrequency losses, a robust correlation is achieved between simulated and experimental data using the 8-channel dipole array at 7T.

Indexed as

co-simulationdipole arrayMRI coilsRF coilsRF lossessimulation validationultra-high field

Identifiers

PMID38610465
PMCPMC11014297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.