Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610305›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Performance Comparison between Different Industrial Real-Time Indoor Localization Systems for Mobile Platforms.

Paulo M Rebelo, José Lima, Salviano Pinto Soares, Paulo Moura Oliveira, Héber Sobreira, Pedro Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paulo M RebeloInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4133-3210
José LimaInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7902-1207
Salviano Pinto SoaresSchool of Sciences and Technology-Engineering Department (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5862-5706
Paulo Moura OliveiraInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4283-1243
Héber SobreiraInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8055-1093
Pedro CostaInstitute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (INESC TEC), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-8419

Funding

Capitalization and Business Innovation Component 5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The flexibility and versatility associated with autonomous mobile robots (AMR) have facilitated their integration into different types of industries and tasks. However, as the main objective of their implementation on the factory floor is to optimize processes and, consequently, the time associated with them, it is necessary to take into account the environment and congestion to which they are subjected. Localization, on the shop floor and in real time, is an important requirement to optimize the AMRs' trajectory management, thus avoiding livelocks and deadlocks during their movements in partnership with manual forklift operators and logistic trains. Threeof the most commonly used localization techniques in indoor environments (time of flight, angle of arrival, and time difference of arrival), as well as two of the most commonly used indoor localization methods in the industry (ultra-wideband, and ultrasound), are presented and compared in this paper. Furthermore, it identifies and compares three industrial indoor localization solutions: Qorvo, Eliko Kio, and Marvelmind, implemented in an industrial mobile platform, which is the main contribution of this paper. These solutions can be applied to both AMRs and other mobile platforms, such as forklifts and logistic trains. In terms of results, the Marvelmind system, which uses an ultrasound method, was the best solution.

Indexed as

autonomous mobile robotsindoor localization systemslocalization technologiessensors

Identifiers

PMID38610305
PMCPMC11014360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.