Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610214›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Suicide Interventions in Spain and Japan: A Comparative Systematic Review.

Noelia Lucía Martínez-Rives, María Del Pilar Martín Chaparro, Bibha Dhungel, Stuart Gilmour, Rory D Colman, Yasuhiro Kotera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpersonal Determinants of Suicide Risk Among Young Adults: A Cross-Cultural Study.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Noelia Lucía Martínez-RivesDepartment of Psychiatry and Social Psychology, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-4925
María Del Pilar Martín ChaparroDepartment of Psychiatry and Social Psychology, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-3455
Bibha DhungelSchool of International Liberal Studies, Waseda University, Tokyo 169-0051, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0014-8385
Stuart GilmourGraduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6556-0995
Rory D ColmanCollege of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4438-9081
Yasuhiro KoteraFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-0085
Universidad de Murcia · ESSt. Luke's International University · JPUniversity of Derby · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: This systematic review presents an overview of psychological interventions in suicide published between 2013 and 2023 in Spain and Japan, sparked by Spain's alarming recent increase in suicide rates and the potential exemplar of Japan's reduction efforts. (2) Methods: Following the PRISMA checklist, the databases Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and PsycInfo were searched using the terms [("suicide" OR "suicidal behavior" OR "suicidal attempt" OR "suicidal thought" OR "suicidal intention") AND ("prevention" OR "intervention" OR "psychosocial treatment" OR "Dialectical Behavior Therapy" OR "Cognitive Therapy" OR "psychotherap*")] AND [("Spain" OR "Spanish") OR ("Japan" OR "Japanese")]. We included articles published in peer-reviewed academic journals, written in English, Spanish, and Japanese between 2013 and 2023 that presented, designed, implemented, or assessed psychological interventions focused on suicidal behavior. (3) Results: 46 studies were included, concerning prevention, treatment, and training interventions. The risk of bias was low in both Spanish and Japanese studies, despite the lack of randomization of the samples. We identified common characteristics, such as psychoeducation and coping skills. Assertive case management was only highlighted in Japan, making an emphasis on active patient involvement in his/her care plan. (4) Conclusions: The findings will help professionals to incorporate into their interventions broader, more comprehensive approaches to consider more interpersonal components.

Indexed as

Japanpsychological interventionSpainsuicidesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38610214
PMCPMC11011319
OpenAlexW4394581341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.