Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610208›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Something Happened with the Way We Work: Evaluating the Implementation of the Reducing Coercion in Norway (ReCoN) Intervention in Primary Mental Health Care.

Tonje Lossius Husum, Irene Wormdahl, Solveig H H Kjus, Trond Hatling, Jorun Rugkåsa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tonje Lossius HusumFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0166 Oslo, Norway.
Irene WormdahlDepartment of Mental Health Work, NTNU Social Research, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4014-2113
Solveig H H KjusNorwegian Resource Centre for Community Mental Health, NTNU Social Research, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Trond HatlingNorwegian Resource Centre for Community Mental Health, NTNU Social Research, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Jorun RugkåsaFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0166 Oslo, Norway.
NTNU Samfunnsforskning · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway Grant no: 273546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent policies to reduce the use of involuntary admissions are largely oriented towards specialist mental health care and have had limited success. We co-created, with stakeholders in five Norwegian municipalities, the 'Reducing Coercion in Norway' (ReCoN) intervention that aims to reduce involuntary admissions by improving the way in which primary mental health services work and collaborate. The intervention was implemented in five municipalities and is being tested in a cluster randomized control trial, which is yet to be published. The present study evaluates the implementation process in the five intervention municipalities. To assess how the intervention was executed, we report on how its different elements were implemented, and what helped or hindered implementation.

methodsWe assessed the process using qualitative methods. Data included detailed notes from quarterly progress interviews with (i) intervention coordinators and representatives from (ii) user organisations and (iii) carer organisations. Finally, an end-of-intervention evaluation seminar included participants from across the sites.

resultsThe majority of intervention actions were implemented. We believe this was enabled by the co-creating process, which ensured ownership and a good fit for the local setting. The analysis of facilitators and barriers showed a high degree of interconnectedness between different parts of the intervention so that success (or lack thereof) in one area affected the success in others. Future implementation should pay attention to enhanced planning and training, clarify the role and contribution of service user and carer involvement, and pay close attention to the need for implementation support and whether this should be external or internal to services.

conclusionsIt is feasible to implement a complex intervention designed to reduce the use of involuntary admissions in general support services, such as the Norwegian primary mental health services. This could have implications for national and international policy aimed at reducing the use of involuntary care.

Indexed as

co-creationcomplex interventionimplementation researchinvoluntary admissionmental health servicesparticipatory researchprimary mental health careprocess evaluationreducing coercion

Identifiers

PMID38610208
PMCPMC11011458
OpenAlexW4393934611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.