Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610198›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Co-Designed Cardiac Rehabilitation for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke (CARESS): A Pilot Program Evaluation.

Sabah Rehman, Seamus Barker, Kim Jose, Michele Callisaya, Helen Castley, Martin G Schultz, Myles N Moore, Dawn B Simpson, Gregory M Peterson, Seana Gall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sabah RehmanMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Seamus BarkerMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Kim JoseMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Michele CallisayaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Helen CastleyRoyal Hobart Hospital, Tasmanian Health Service, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Martin G SchultzMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Myles N MooreMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
Dawn B SimpsonCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-3882
Seana GallMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5138-2526
University of Tasmania · AURoyal Hobart Hospital · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1182071National Heart Foundation of Australia 102061Royal Hobart Hospital Research Foundation NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structured health system-based programs, such as cardiac rehabilitation, may reduce the risk of recurrent stroke. This study aimed to co-design and evaluate a structured program of rehabilitation, developed based on insights from focus groups involving stroke survivors and health professionals. Conducted in Tasmania, Australia in 2019, the 7-week program comprised one hour of group exercise and one hour of education each week. Functional capacity (6 min walk test), fatigue, symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire), and lifestyle were assessed pre- and post-program, with a historical control group for comparison. Propensity score matching determined the average treatment effect (ATE) of the program. Key themes from the co-design focus groups included the need for coordinated care, improved psychosocial management, and including carers and peers in programs. Of the 23 people approached, 10 participants (70% men, mean age 67.4 ± 8.6 years) completed the program without adverse events. ATE analysis revealed improvements in functional capacity (139 m, 95% CI 44, 234) and fatigue (-5 units, 95% CI -9, -1), with a small improvement in symptoms of depression (-0.8 units, 95% CI -1.8, 0.2) compared to controls. The co-designed program demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and positive outcomes, suggesting its potential to support stroke survivors.

Indexed as

co-designsecondary preventionstroke

Identifiers

PMID38610198
PMCPMC11012137
OpenAlexW4393865714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.