Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610186›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Individualized Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Mexico City Municipality during the First Six Waves of the Pandemic.

Mariel Victorino-Aguilar, Abel Lerma, Humberto Badillo-Alonso, Víctor Manuel Ramos-Lojero, Luis Israel Ledesma-Amaya, Silvia Ruiz-Velasco Acosta, Claudia Lerma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariel Victorino-AguilarMaster's Program in Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1338-3253
Abel LermaArea of Psychology, Institute of Health Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7212-641X
Humberto Badillo-AlonsoJalalpa el Grande Health Center, Mexico City Health Secretariat, Mexico City 01377, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5746-3944
Víctor Manuel Ramos-LojeroHealth Jurisdiction Alvaro Obregon, Mexico City Secretary of Health, Mexico City 01470, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0000-2397-2118
Luis Israel Ledesma-AmayaArea of Psychology, Institute of Health Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-272X
Silvia Ruiz-Velasco AcostaInstituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas (IIMAS), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9220-2368
Claudia LermaCentro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), FCS, Universidad Anáhuac México Campus Norte, Huixquilucan Edo. de Mexico 52786, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-7751
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo · MXUniversidad Anáhuac · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After COVID-19 emerged, alternative methods to laboratory tests for the individualized prediction of SARS-CoV-2 were developed in several world regions. The objective of this investigation was to develop models for the individualized prediction of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large municipality of Mexico. The study included data from 36,949 patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection who received a diagnostic tested at health centers of the Alvaro Obregon Jurisdiction in Mexico City registered in the Epidemiological Surveillance System for Viral Respiratory Diseases (SISVER-SINAVE). The variables that were different between a positive test and a negative test were used to generate multivariate binary logistic regression models. There was a large variation in the prediction variables for the models of different pandemic waves. The models obtained an overall accuracy of 73% (63-82%), sensitivity of 52% (18-71%), and specificity of 84% (71-92%). In conclusion, the individualized prediction models of a positive COVID-19 test based on SISVER-SINAVE data had good performance. The large variation in the prediction variables for the models of different pandemic waves highlights the continuous change in the factors that influence the spread of COVID-19. These prediction models could be applied in early case identification strategies, especially in vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19logistic regressionrisk factorsstatistical modelingsymptoms

Identifiers

PMID38610186
PMCPMC11011518
OpenAlexW4393352571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.