Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610184›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Health Literacy and Self-Care in Patients with Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.

Camilla Elena Magi, Stefano Bambi, Laura Rasero, Yari Longobucco, Khadija El Aoufy, Carla Amato, Ercole Vellone, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, Chiara Lorini, Paolo Iovino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Camilla Elena MagiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-5599-2405
Stefano BambiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0360-4470
Laura RaseroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Yari LongobuccoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2703-9349
Khadija El AoufyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Carla AmatoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Ercole VelloneDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-7473
Guglielmo BonaccorsiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5171-4308
Chiara LoriniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-1857
Paolo IovinoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-care plays a critical role in symptom recognition, management, and risk factor modification for patients with chronic illnesses. Despite its significance, self-care levels in this population are generally poor. Health literacy (HL) is pivotal for promoting effective self-care, yet the association across specific chronic illnesses remains fragmented and conflicting. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted. Inclusion criteria encompass quantitative studies involving adult patients with at least one chronic illness reporting on the association between a measure of HL and one or more elements of self-care behaviors as outcomes. Databases to be searched include PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The studies will undergo risk of bias and certainty of evidence assessment using ROBINS-E and GRADE. Extracted data will include authors, publication date, aim(s), study location, design, sample characteristics, chronic illness type, study length, HL, and self-care measures. Understanding the link between HL and self-care can aid healthcare providers in implementing strategies to enhance health-promoting behaviors, contributing valuable insights to the scientific community and fostering nuanced discussions. This protocol ensures methodological transparency, stimulates discourse, and paves the way for informed interventions to improve overall health outcomes.

Indexed as

chronic diseasechronic illnessdigital health literacyhealth literacymeta-analysisnon-communicable diseaseprotocolself-caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38610184
PMCPMC11011384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.