Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38610167›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Validation and Clinical Application of the Japanese Version of the Patient-Reported Experience Measures for Intermediate Care Services: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yuko Goto, Hisayuki Miura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuko GotoDepartment of Home Care and Regional Liaison Promotion, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2447-7658
Hisayuki MiuraDepartment of Home Care and Regional Liaison Promotion, Hospital, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu 474-8511, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4780-9857
National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology · JP

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP22K10920The National Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology 20-44, 22-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adult patients account for 70% of all hospitalized patients in Japan, and intermediate care based on patient-centered care (PCC) that ensures continuity and quality of care at the interface between home services and acute care services and restores patient's independence and confidence is necessary for them to continue living independently. At present, no concept of intermediate care is established in Japan, and the implementation of PCC has been delayed. Thus, in this study, a Japanese version of the intermediate care evaluation index (patient-reported experience measure (PREM)) was created on the basis of the original PREM developed in the UK, and data in wards with intermediate care functions in Japan were collected to confirm internal consistency and validity from 2020 to 2022. The Japanese version of PREM was found to have a factor structure with two potential factors. Given the clear correlation with the shared decision-making evaluation index, which is the pinnacle of PCC, the theoretical validity of the Japanese version of PREM, which is based on PCC as a theoretical basis, was confirmed.

Indexed as

community-based care wardcommunity-based integrated care systemcommunity comprehensive care wardconvalescence rehabilitation wardintermediate careKaifukuki rehabilitation wardpatient-centered carepatient-reported experience measureregional comprehensive care system

Identifiers

PMID38610167
PMCPMC11012065
OpenAlexW4393318255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.