ArticlePhysiological reports2024
Eight weeks of treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor blockade does not alter vascular function in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes.
Article in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aldosterone has been suggested to be involved in the microvascular complications observed in type 2 diabetes. We aimed to investigate the effect of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) blockade on endothelial function in individuals with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy controls. We included 12 participants with type 2 diabetes and 14 controls. We measured leg hemodynamics at baseline and during femoral arterial infusion of acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside before and 8 weeks into treatment with MR blockade (eplerenone). Acetylcholine infusion was repeated with concomitant n-acetylcysteine (antioxidant) infusion. No difference in leg blood flow or vascular conductance was detected before or after the treatment with MR blockade in both groups and there was no difference between groups. Infusion of n-acetylcysteine increased baseline blood flow and vascular conductance, but did not change the vascular response to acetylcholine before or after treatment with MR blockade. Skeletal muscle eNOS content was unaltered by MR blockade and no difference between groups was detected. In conclusion, we found no effect of MR blockade endothelial function in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes. As the individuals with type 2 diabetes did not have vascular dysfunction, these results might not apply to individuals with vascular dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.