ArticleJournal of radiation research2024
Are prophylactic antibiotics required for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of gynecologic cancers?
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Newborn morbidities and care procedures at the special newborn care units of Gandaki Province, Nepal: a retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for prophylactic antibiotic treatment prior to combined intracavitary and interstitial (hybrid) brachytherapy for gynecologic cancer. A total of 105 gynecologic cancer patients received 405 brachytherapy sessions, including 302 sessions of intracavitary brachytherapy and 103 sessions of hybrid brachytherapy. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered before 35% of the hybrid brachytherapy sessions. The incidence of postbrachytherapy fever and the frequency of subsequent antibiotic use for infection were compared between treatment groups. Among patients treated with hybrid brachytherapy, fever ≥37.5°C occurred in 16.4% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 16.7% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Similarly, fever ≥38.0°C occurred in 4.9% of patients not receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 2.4% of those receiving prophylactic antibiotics (P > 0.05). Additional antibiotics were used to treat postbrachytherapy infections in 4.8% of the group receiving prophylactic antibiotics and 0% of those not receiving prophylactic antibiotics, again without statistically significant difference. There were also no significant differences in posttreatment fever incidence and antibiotics use for infection between intracavitary brachytherapy and hybrid brachytherapy sessions. In conclusion, the incidences of infection and fever are low following hybrid brachytherapy, so prophylactic antibiotics are generally unnecessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.