ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
A novel model of locking plate and locking spongious screw: a biomechanical in vitro comparison study with classical locking plate.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional and Radiological Outcomes Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Analytical Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- A biomechanical study of locking spongious screws and failure rates are higher than expected in plate fixation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocking plates are commonly used for the fixation of comminuted, periprosthetic and osteoporotic bone fractures. These plates are secured to the bone with screws, creating a stable connection with fixed angle between the plate and the screws. In this biomechanical in vitro study, our aim is to evaluate and compare the novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model with FDA approved classical locking plate.
methodsSawbone PCF-15 osteoporotic bone model was utilized to simulate osteoporotic bone conditions. Two screws were used to attach both the classical locking plate and the novel locking plate-locking spongious screw model to these bone models. The attachment strength of the screws to the bone blocks was measured by pull-out tests.
resultsNovel locking plate-locking spongious screw model exhibited an 84.38% stronger attachment to the osteoporotic bone model compared to the current locking plate model.
conclusionsIn conclusion, one of the important problems in the locking plates which is the high Pull-out risk of the locking spongious screws can been resolved with our proposed new model and has a chance of having a better purchase especially in osteoporotic bones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.