Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609891›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Neonatal outcomes according to different glucose threshold values in gestational diabetes: a register-based study.

Kaisa Kariniemi, Marja Vääräsmäki, Tuija Männistö, Sanna Mustaniemi, Eero Kajantie, Sanna Eteläinen, Elina Keikkala, Finnish Gestational Diabetes [FinnGeDi] study group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Kaisa KariniemiResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Marja VääräsmäkiResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Tuija MännistöNordLab, Oulu, Finland.
Sanna MustaniemiResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Eero KajantieResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Sanna EteläinenResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland.
Elina KeikkalaResearch Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Kajaanintie 50, 90220, Oulu, Finland. elina.keikkala@oulu.fi.
Finnish Gestational Diabetes [FinnGeDi] study group
Oulu University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Turku · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FINordLab · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild hyperglycaemia is associated with increased birth weight but association with other neonatal outcomes is controversial. We aimed to study neonatal outcomes in untreated mild hyperglycaemia using different oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) thresholds.

methodsThis register-based study included all (n = 4,939) singleton pregnant women participating a 75 g 2-h OGTT in six delivery hospitals in Finland in 2009. Finnish diagnostic cut-offs for GDM were fasting ≥ 5.3, 1 h ≥ 10.0 or 2-h glucose ≥ 8.6 mmol/L. Women who did not meet these criteria but met the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria (fasting 5.1-5.2 mmol/L and/or 2-h glucose 8.5 mmol/L, n = 509) or the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) criteria (2-h glucose 7.8-8.5 mmol/L, n = 166) were considered as mild untreated hyperglycaemia. Women who met both the Finnish criteria and the IADPSG or the NICE criteria were considered as treated GDM groups (n = 1292 and n = 612, respectively). Controls were normoglycaemic according to all criteria (fasting glucose < 5.1 mmol/L, 1-h glucose < 10.0 mmol/L and 2-h glucose < 8.5 mmol/L, n = 3031). Untreated mild hyperglycemia groups were compared to controls and treated GDM groups. The primary outcome - a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes, including neonatal hypoglycaemia, hyperbilirubinaemia, birth trauma or perinatal mortality - was analysed using multivariate logistic regression.

resultsThe risk for the adverse neonatal outcome in untreated mild hyperglycemia was not increased compared to controls (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.44, using the IADPSG criteria; aOR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.60-1.85, using the NICE criteria). The risk was lower compared to the treated IADPSG (aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27-0.53) or the treated NICE group (aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.57). DISCUSSION: The risk of adverse neonatal outcomes was not increased in mild untreated hyperglycaemia compared to normoglycaemic controls and was lower than in the treated GDM groups. The OGTT cut-offs of 5.3 mmol/L at fasting and 8.6 mmol/L at 2 h seem to sufficiently identify clinically relevant GDM, without excluding neonates with a risk of adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalHyperglycemiaPregnancy in DiabeticsFastingFemaleGlucoseHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyGlucoseGestational diabetes mellitusIADPSGNeonatal hypoglycaemiaNeonatal outcomeNICEOGTTOral glucose tolerance test

Identifiers

PMID38609891
PMCPMC11010296
OpenAlexW4394753172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.