ArticleBMC genomics2024
Split Pool Ligation-based Single-cell Transcriptome sequencing (SPLiT-seq) data processing pipeline comparison.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced deep learning strategies in nanopore RNA sequencing.RNA biology · 2026Review
- Single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing in prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Tools and tactics for studying alternative splicing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- RAD: A Read-structure Agnostic Demultiplexer for Single-Cell Long-Read Sequencing and Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Immune profiling of T cells: A comparative analysis of single-cell TCR sequencing using 10X Genomics and Parse Biosciences platforms.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Harvesting more reads from single-cell combinatorial barcoding data with scarecrow.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the practical aspects and performance of commercial single-cell RNA sequencing technologies.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Review
- From the brain cell atlas to precision neurology: a review of the application of AI-driven multi-omics in brain science.GigaScience · 2026Review
- Screening and validating HBV mother-to-child transmission-related lncRNAs based on the lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- CapMux: a Snakemake pipeline for early demultiplexing of split-pool scRNA-seq data into sample-resolved outputs.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Novel insights into post-myocardial infarction cardiac remodeling through algorithmic detection of cell-type composition shifts.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Navigating single-cell RNA-sequencing: protocols, tools, databases, and applications.Genomics & informatics · 2025Review
- Data standards for single-cell RNA-sequencing of paediatric cancer.Clinical & translational immunology · 2025Review
- CleanBar: a versatile demultiplexing tool for split-and-pool barcoding in single-cell omics.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Understanding isoform expression by pairing long-read sequencing with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.Genome research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell sequencing techniques are revolutionizing every field of biology by providing the ability to measure the abundance of biological molecules at a single-cell resolution. Although single-cell sequencing approaches have been developed for several molecular modalities, single-cell transcriptome sequencing is the most prevalent and widely applied technique. SPLiT-seq (split-pool ligation-based transcriptome sequencing) is one of these single-cell transcriptome techniques that applies a unique combinatorial-barcoding approach by splitting and pooling cells into multi-well plates containing barcodes. This unique approach required the development of dedicated computational tools to preprocess the data and extract the count matrices. Here we compare eight bioinformatic pipelines (alevin-fry splitp, LR-splitpipe, SCSit, splitpipe, splitpipeline, SPLiTseq-demultiplex, STARsolo and zUMI) that have been developed to process SPLiT-seq data. We provide an overview of the tools, their computational performance, functionality and impact on downstream processing of the single-cell data, which vary greatly depending on the tool used.
resultsWe show that STARsolo, splitpipe and alevin-fry splitp can all handle large amount of data within reasonable time. In contrast, the other five pipelines are slow when handling large datasets. When using smaller dataset, cell barcode results are similar with the exception of SPLiTseq-demultiplex and splitpipeline. LR-splitpipe that is originally designed for processing long-read sequencing data is the slowest of all pipelines. Alevin-fry produced different down-stream results that are difficult to interpret. STARsolo functions nearly identical to splitpipe and produce results that are highly similar to each other. However, STARsolo lacks the function to collapse random hexamer reads for which some additional coding is required.
conclusionOur comprehensive comparative analysis aids users in selecting the most suitable analysis tool for efficient SPLiT-seq data processing, while also detailing the specific prerequisites for each of these pipelines. From the available pipelines, we recommend splitpipe or STARSolo for SPLiT-seq data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.