ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Long-term results of accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking in paediatric patients with progressive keratoconus: 10-year follow-up.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Science and Clinical Evolution of Corneal Cross-Linking: Mechanism of Action, Ultra-Structural Changes, Clinical Indications, and Emerging Treatment Strategies.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the 10-year visual, refractive, and tomographic outcomes of epithelium-off accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (ACCL) in paediatric patients with progressive keratoconus (KC) and to compare the stages in terms of re-progression.
methodsPatients under 18 years of age with progressive KC who underwent ACCL between 2010 and 2012 and completed at least 10 years of follow-up were included in this retrospective study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive errors, and corneal tomography parameters were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. The effect of stage and age on re-progression was analysed.
resultsThe study included 175 eyes of 97 patients (mean age: 14.46 ± 2.17 years). Improvement in UDVA and CDVA was observed in all postoperative periods compared to the preoperative period (each p-value < 0.05). The increase in spherical equivalent (SE), flattening of keratometry values, and decrease in thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) were statistically significant in the tenth year compared to preoperatively (each p-value < 0.05). Re-progression was observed in 16 eyes (9.14%). Haze was observed in 13 eyes (7.43%), 4 of which were permanent. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed in 3 eyes (1.7%) and a second ACCL in 3 eyes (1.7%).
conclusionsACCL is an effective and safe long-term strategy to prevent progression of KC in paediatric patients. In the light of this study with a 10-year follow-up re-progression rate of 9.14%, long-term follow-up of patients after ACCL for possible re-progression and the need for re-CCL or keratoplasty may be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.