Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609622›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2024

A life cycle analysis of the environmental impact of procurement, waste and water in the dental practice.

Peter Suresh, John Crotty, Sonja Tesanovic, Othman Alaweed, Sadhbh Doyle, Mikra Kiandee, Emily Hayes, Vanessa Umeh, Bita Khalilinejad, Brett Duane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peter SureshUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. sureshpe@tcd.ie.
John CrottyDivision of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Sonja TesanovicUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Othman AlaweedUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Sadhbh DoyleUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Mikra KiandeeUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Emily HayesUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Vanessa UmehUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Bita KhalilinejadUndergraduate Student, Dental Science, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Brett DuaneAssociate Professor in Dental Public Health, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Health care is a significant contributor to climate change. Global pressure for a change towards a more sustainable way of providing dental health care has resulted in the creation of the Green Impact Toolkit, which is comprised of a list of suggested changes that dental practices can make to become more sustainable in a number of categories, such as procurement, waste and water.Aims To compare the effectiveness of changes suggested by the Green Impact Toolkit.Materials and methods A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using the Ecoinvent database v3.8 and these data were processed using OpenLCA v1.10.3 software.Results The carbon footprint per patient was significantly reduced after the recommendations were implemented. For instance, using water from a rainwater collection tank instead of the mains supply saved 30 g CO2eq (carbon dioxide equivalents) per patient, a 90% reduction in carbon footprint.Discussion This comparative LCA identified some effective changes which can be easily made by a dental practice. Nevertheless, some actions require some initial financial investment and may be difficult to implement in a busy modern dental practice setting.Conclusion The findings from this study can be used to guide dental practices to making choices which are more sustainable and eco-friendly in the future.

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintWaterAnimalsHumansLife Cycle StagesSoftwareWater

Identifiers

PMID38609622
PMCPMC11014795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.