Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609504›Full record

ReviewNpj mental health research2023

Systematic review of machine learning in PTSD studies for automated diagnosis evaluation.

Yuqi Wu, Kaining Mao, Liz Dennett, Yanbo Zhang, Jie Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Npj mental health research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuqi WuElectrical & Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6527-2221
Kaining MaoElectrical & Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-6635
Liz DennettScott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0758-5411
Yanbo ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. yanbo.zhang@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-157X
Jie ChenElectrical & Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. jc65@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7925-3729

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202000810031China Scholarship Council 202308180002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is frequently underdiagnosed due to its clinical and biological heterogeneity. Worldwide, many people face barriers to accessing accurate and timely diagnoses. Machine learning (ML) techniques have been utilized for early assessments and outcome prediction to address these challenges. This paper aims to conduct a systematic review to investigate if ML is a promising approach for PTSD diagnosis. In this review, statistical methods were employed to synthesize the outcomes of the included research and provide guidance on critical considerations for ML task implementation. These included (a) selection of the most appropriate ML model for the available dataset, (b) identification of optimal ML features based on the chosen diagnostic method, (c) determination of appropriate sample size based on the distribution of the data, and (d) implementation of suitable validation tools to assess the performance of the selected ML models. We screened 3186 studies and included 41 articles based on eligibility criteria in the final synthesis. Here we report that the analysis of the included studies highlights the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in PTSD diagnosis. However, implementing AI-based diagnostic systems in real clinical settings requires addressing several limitations, including appropriate regulation, ethical considerations, and protection of patient privacy.

Identifiers

PMID38609504
PMCPMC10955977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.