Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609477›Full record

ArticleNpj mental health research2022

Head versus heart: social media reveals differential language of loneliness from depression.

Tingting Liu, Lyle H Ungar, Brenda Curtis, Garrick Sherman, Kenna Yadeta, Louis Tay, Johannes C Eichstaedt, Sharath Chandra Guntuku

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Npj mental health research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Digital phenotyping and ASCVD risk: An exploratory cross-sectional analysis using online behavioral data.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Multidimensional Loneliness Among University Students: A Latent Profile Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Loneliness and socioemotional memory.The British journal of social psychology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Different Affordances on Facebook and SMS Text Messaging Do Not Impede Generalization of Language-Based Predictive Models.Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tingting LiuNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA IRP), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore, MD, USA. tingting.liu@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8179-6180
Lyle H UngarPositive Psychology Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brenda CurtisNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA IRP), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Garrick ShermanPositive Psychology Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kenna YadetaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA IRP), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore, MD, USA.
Louis TayDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Johannes C EichstaedtDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Human-Centered A.I., Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sharath Chandra GuntukuDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. sharathg@cis.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-0035
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the language differentially associated with loneliness and depression using 3.4-million Facebook posts from 2986 individuals, and uncover the statistical associations of survey-based depression and loneliness with both dictionary-based (Linguistic Inquiry Word Count 2015) and open-vocabulary linguistic features (words, phrases, and topics). Loneliness and depression were found to have highly overlapping language profiles, including sickness, pain, and negative emotions as (cross-sectional) risk factors, and social relationships and activities as protective factors. Compared to depression, the language associated with loneliness reflects a stronger cognitive focus, including more references to cognitive processes (i.e., differentiation and tentative language, thoughts, and the observation of irregularities), and cognitive activities like reading and writing. As might be expected, less lonely users were more likely to reference social relationships (e.g., friends and family, romantic relationships), and use first-person plural pronouns. Our findings suggest that the mechanisms of loneliness include self-oriented cognitive activities (i.e., reading) and an overattention to the interpretation of information in the environment. These data-driven ecological findings suggest interventions for loneliness that target maladaptive social cognitions (e.g., through reframing the perception of social environments), strengthen social relationships, and treat other affective distress (i.e., depression).

Identifiers

PMID38609477
PMCPMC10955894
OpenAlexW4306754744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.