Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609463›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Randomness impacts the building of specific priors, visual exploration, and perception in object recognition.

Cécile Gal, Ioana Țincaș, Vasile V Moca, Andrei Ciuparu, Emanuela L Dan, Marie L Smith, Teodora Gliga, Raul C Mureșan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cécile Gal *Department of Experimental and Theoretical Neuroscience, Transylvanian Institute of Neuroscience, Str. Ploiești 33, 400157, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioana Țincaș *Department of Experimental and Theoretical Neuroscience, Transylvanian Institute of Neuroscience, Str. Ploiești 33, 400157, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Vasile V MocaDepartment of Experimental and Theoretical Neuroscience, Transylvanian Institute of Neuroscience, Str. Ploiești 33, 400157, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrei CiuparuDepartment of Experimental and Theoretical Neuroscience, Transylvanian Institute of Neuroscience, Str. Ploiești 33, 400157, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Emanuela L DanDepartment of Experimental and Theoretical Neuroscience, Transylvanian Institute of Neuroscience, Str. Ploiești 33, 400157, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Marie L SmithCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK.
Teodora GligaSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Raul C MureșanDepartment of Experimental and Theoretical Neuroscience, Transylvanian Institute of Neuroscience, Str. Ploiești 33, 400157, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. muresan@tins.ro.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognising objects is a vital skill on which humans heavily rely to respond quickly and adaptively to their environment. Yet, we lack a full understanding of the role visual information sampling plays in this process, and its relation to the individual's priors. To bridge this gap, the eye-movements of 18 adult participants were recorded during a free-viewing object-recognition task using Dots stimuli

Indexed as

Eye MovementsVisual PerceptionAdultHumansRecognition, PsychologyRecords

Identifiers

PMID38609463
PMCPMC11014901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.