ArticleScientific reports2024
Fast learning without synaptic plasticity in spiking neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
- Maximizing theoretical and practical storage capacity in single-layer feedforward neural networks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Biologically plausible gated recurrent neural networks for working memory and learning-to-learn.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Spiking neural networks are of high current interest, both from the perspective of modelling neural networks of the brain and for porting their fast learning capability and energy efficiency into neuromorphic hardware. But so far we have not been able to reproduce fast learning capabilities of the brain in spiking neural networks. Biological data suggest that a synergy of synaptic plasticity on a slow time scale with network dynamics on a faster time scale is responsible for fast learning capabilities of the brain. We show here that a suitable orchestration of this synergy between synaptic plasticity and network dynamics does in fact reproduce fast learning capabilities of generic recurrent networks of spiking neurons. This points to the important role of recurrent connections in spiking networks, since these are necessary for enabling salient network dynamics. We show more specifically that the proposed synergy enables synaptic weights to encode more general information such as priors and task structures, since moment-to-moment processing of new information can be delegated to the network dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.