Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609318›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2024

Psychosis with use of amphetamine drugs, methylphenidate and atomoxetine in adolescent and adults.

Jacques Hamard, Vanessa Rousseau, Geneviève Durrieu, Philippe Garcia, Antoine Yrondi, Agnès Sommet, Alexis Revet, François Montastruc

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jacques HamardDepartment of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France jacques.hamard@ch-marchant.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2564-0658
Vanessa RousseauDepartment of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Geneviève DurrieuDepartment of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Philippe GarciaDepartment of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Antoine YrondiDepartment of Medical Psychiatry, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Agnès SommetDepartment of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Alexis RevetDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
François MontastrucDepartment of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRLife Medical Control (France) · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of psychostimulants and relative drugs has increased worldwide in treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adolescents and adults. Recent studies suggest a potential association between use of psychostimulants and psychotic symptoms. The risk may not be the same between different psychostimulants.

objectiveTo assess whether amphetamine or atomoxetine use is associated with a higher risk of reporting symptoms of psychosis than methylphenidate use in adolescents and adults, particularly in patients with ADHD.

methodsUsing VigiBase, the WHO's pharmacovigilance database, disproportionality of psychotic symptoms reporting was assessed among adverse drug reactions related to methylphenidate, atomoxetine and amphetamines, from January 2004 to December 2018, in patients aged 13-25 years. The association between psychotic symptoms and psychostimulants was estimated through the calculation of reporting OR (ROR).

findingsAmong 13 863 reports with at least one drug of interest, we found 221 cases of psychosis with methylphenidate use, 115 with atomoxetine use and 169 with a prescription of an amphetamine drug. Compared with methylphenidate use, amphetamine use was associated with an increased risk of reporting psychotic symptoms (ROR 1.61 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.06)]. When we restricted the analysis to ADHD indication, we found a close estimate (ROR 1.94 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.64)). No association was found for atomoxetine.

conclusionOur study suggests that amphetamine use is associated with a higher reporting of psychotic symptoms, compared with methylphenidate use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The prescription of psychostimulants should consider this potential adverse effect when assessing the benefit-risk balance.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMethylphenidatePsychotic DisordersAdolescentAdultAmphetamineAtomoxetine HydrochlorideHumansAmphetamineAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateChild & adolescent psychiatrySchizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID38609318
PMCPMC11029235
OpenAlexW4394772119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.