Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609287›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2024

PECARN prediction rules for CT imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma: a multicentre prospective validation study.

James F Holmes, Kenneth Yen, Irma T Ugalde, Paul Ishimine, Pradip P Chaudhari, Nisa Atigapramoj, Mohamed Badawy, Kevan A McCarten-Gibbs, Donovan Nielsen, Allyson C Sage and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Guardian Presence in Research Conducted on Children With Blunt Abdominal Trauma in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Blunt abdominal trauma in a 6-year-old boy and need for imaging.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

James F HolmesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA. Electronic address: jfholmes@ucdavis.edu.
Kenneth YenDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Children's Health, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Irma T UgaldeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
Paul IshimineDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Pradip P ChaudhariDivision of Emergency and Transport Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nisa AtigapramojDepartment of Emergency Medicine, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, CA, USA.
Mohamed BadawyDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Children's Health, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Kevan A McCarten-GibbsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, CA, USA.
Donovan NielsenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Allyson C SageDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Grant TatroVirginia Commonwealth School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jeffrey S UppermanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
P David AdelsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine and Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Daniel J TancrediDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Nathan KuppermannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital · USBlanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USOffice of Multidisciplinary Activities · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USVanderbilt University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Validation of Decision Rules for CT Use in Children with Abdominal or Head TraumaR01HD084674 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HOLMES, JAMES F., KUPPERMANN, NATHAN · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intra-abdominal injury and traumatic brain injury prediction rules derived by the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) were designed to reduce inappropriate use of CT in children with abdominal and head trauma, respectively. We aimed to validate these prediction rules for children presenting to emergency departments with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma.

methodsFor this prospective validation study, we enrolled children and adolescents younger than 18 years presenting to six emergency departments in Sacramento (CA), Dallas (TX), Houston (TX), San Diego (CA), Los Angeles (CA), and Oakland (CA), USA between Dec 27, 2016, and Sept 1, 2021. We excluded patients who were pregnant or had pre-existing neurological disorders preventing examination, penetrating trauma, injuries more than 24 h before arrival, CT or MRI before transfer, or high suspicion of non-accidental trauma. Children presenting with blunt abdominal trauma were enrolled into an abdominal trauma cohort, and children with minor head trauma were enrolled into one of two age-segregated minor head trauma cohorts (younger than 2 years vs aged 2 years and older). Enrolled children were clinically examined in the emergency department, and CT scans were obtained at the attending clinician's discretion. All enrolled children were evaluated against the variables of the pertinent PECARN prediction rule before CT results were seen. The primary outcome of interest in the abdominal trauma cohort was intra-abdominal injury undergoing acute intervention (therapeutic laparotomy, angiographic embolisation, blood transfusion, intravenous fluid for ≥2 days for pancreatic or gastrointestinal injuries, or death from intra-abdominal injury). In the age-segregated minor head trauma cohorts, the primary outcome of interest was clinically important traumatic brain injury (neurosurgery, intubation for >24 h for traumatic brain injury, or hospital admission ≥2 nights for ongoing symptoms and CT-confirmed traumatic brain injury; or death from traumatic brain injury).

findings7542 children with blunt abdominal trauma and 19 999 children with minor head trauma were enrolled. The intra-abdominal injury rule had a sensitivity of 100·0% (95% CI 98·0-100·0; correct test for 145 of 145 patients with intra-abdominal injury undergoing acute intervention) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100·0% (95% CI 99·9-100·0; correct test for 3488 of 3488 patients without intra-abdominal injuries undergoing acute intervention). The traumatic brain injury rule for children younger than 2 years had a sensitivity of 100·0% (93·1-100·0; 42 of 42) for clinically important traumatic brain injuries and an NPV of 100·0%; 99·9-100·0; 2940 of 2940), whereas the traumatic brain injury rule for children aged 2 years and older had a sensitivity of 98·8% (95·8-99·9; 168 of 170) and an NPV of 100·0% (99·9-100·0; 6015 of 6017). The two children who were misclassified by the traumatic brain injury rule were admitted to hospital for observation but did not need neurosurgery.

interpretationThe PECARN intra-abdominal injury and traumatic brain injury rules were validated with a high degree of accuracy. Their implementation in paediatric emergency departments can therefore be considered a safe strategy to minimise inappropriate CT use in children needing high-quality care for abdominal or head trauma.

fundingThe Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticCraniocerebral TraumaEmergency Medical ServicesAdolescentChildEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID38609287
PMCPMC13525905
OpenAlexW4394706423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.