Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38609167›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025

Substituting Carbohydrate at Lunch for Added Protein Increases Fat Oxidation During Subsequent Exercise in Healthy Males.

Tommy Slater, William J A Mode, Louise C Bonnard, Cian Sweeney, Mark P Funnell, Harry A Smith, John Hough, Ruth M James, Ian Varley, Craig Sale and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tommy SlaterMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2764-3148
William J A ModeMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4667-2876
Louise C BonnardMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.
Cian SweeneyMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6711-5684
Mark P FunnellNational Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7473-5999
Harry A SmithDepartment for Health, Centre for Nutrition Exercise and Metabolism, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-1837
John HoughMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6970-5779
Ruth M JamesMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7119-3159
Ian VarleyMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3607-8921
Craig SaleDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport, Manchester, M1 7EL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5816-4169
James A BettsDepartment for Health, Centre for Nutrition Exercise and Metabolism, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9129-5777
Lewis J JamesNational Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6514-5823
David J ClaytonMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5481-0891
Nottingham Trent University · GBLoughborough University · GBUniversity of Bath · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

Nottingham Trent University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHow pre-exercise meal composition influences metabolic and health responses to exercise later in the day is currently unclear.

objectiveExamine the effects of substituting carbohydrate for protein at lunch on subsequent exercise metabolism, appetite, and energy intake.

methodsTwelve healthy males completed 3 trials in randomized, counterbalanced order. Following a standardized breakfast (779 ± 66 kcal; ∼08:15), participants consumed a lunch (1186 ± 140 kcal; ∼13:15) containing either 0.2 g·kg-1 carbohydrate and ∼2 g·kg-1 protein (LO-CARB), or 2 g·kg-1 carbohydrate and ∼0.4 g·kg-1 protein (HI-CARB), or they fasted (FAST). Participants later cycled at ∼60% V̇O2peak for 1 hour (∼16:15) and post-exercise ad libitum energy intake was measured (∼18:30). Substrate oxidation, subjective appetite, and plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), peptide YY (PYY), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and acylated ghrelin were measured for 5 hours post-lunch.

resultsFat oxidation was greater during FAST (+11.66 ± 6.63 g) and LO-CARB (+8.00 ± 3.83 g) than HI-CARB (P < .001), with FAST greater than LO-CARB (+3.67 ± 5.07 g; P < .05). NEFA were lowest in HI-CARB and highest in FAST, with insulin demonstrating the inverse response (all P < .01). PYY and GLP-1 demonstrated a stepwise pattern, with LO-CARB greatest and FAST lowest (all P < .01). Acylated ghrelin was lower during HI-CARB and LO-CARB vs FAST (P < .01). Energy intake in LO-CARB was lower than FAST (-383 ± 233 kcal; P < .001) and HI-CARB (-313 ± 284 kcal; P < .001).

conclusionSubstituting carbohydrate for protein in a pre-exercise lunch increased fat oxidation, suppressed subjective and hormonal appetite, and reduced post-exercise energy intake.

Indexed as

Dietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsExerciseLipid MetabolismLunchAdultAppetiteBlood GlucoseEnergy IntakeEnergy MetabolismFatty Acids, NonesterifiedGhrelinGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Healthy VolunteersHumansInsulinBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsFatty Acids, NonesterifiedGhrelinGlucagon-Like Peptide 1InsulinPeptide YYappetite hormonescarbohydrate restrictionenergy intakeexercise metabolismfastingprotein

Identifiers

PMID38609167
PMCPMC11834723
OpenAlexW4394785596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.