Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38608359›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2024

The promise and pitfalls of a strength-based approach to child poverty and neurocognitive development: Implications for policy.

Meriah L DeJoseph, Monica E Ellwood-Lowe, Dana Miller-Cotto, David Silverman, Katherine Adams Shannon, Gabriel Reyes, Divyangana Rakesh, Willem E Frankenhuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Socioeconomic Status Disparities in Children's Cognition-Differences in Degree or Kind?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social Determinants of Health, the developing brain, and risk and resilience for psychopathology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meriah L DeJosephGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, United States. Electronic address: meriahd@stanford.edu.
Monica E Ellwood-LoweDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: mellwood@sas.upenn.edu.
Dana Miller-CottoDepartment of Psychology, Kent State University, United States.
David SilvermanDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, United States.
Katherine Adams ShannonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, United States.
Gabriel ReyesGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, United States.
Divyangana RakeshNeuroimaging Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Willem E FrankenhuisEvolutionary and Population Biology, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security, and Law, Germany.

Funding

Disentangling the role of poverty-related experiences on children's self-regulation: Identifying dynamic and contextually-relevant mechanismsF32HD112065 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DEJOSEPH, MERIAH L · 2023 to 2025
$230k
Testing a Framework of Environmental Adaptation in Children's Learning StrategiesF32HD105705 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHANNON, KATHERINE ADAMS · 2021 to 2023
$207k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD105705NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD112065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been significant progress in understanding the effects of childhood poverty on neurocognitive development. This progress has captured the attention of policymakers and promoted progressive policy reform. However, the prevailing emphasis on the harms associated with childhood poverty may have inadvertently perpetuated a deficit-based narrative, focused on the presumed shortcomings of children and families in poverty. This focus can have unintended consequences for policy (e.g., overlooking strengths) as well as public discourse (e.g., focusing on individual rather than systemic factors). Here, we join scientists across disciplines in arguing for a more well-rounded, "strength-based" approach, which incorporates the positive and/or adaptive developmental responses to experiences of social disadvantage. Specifically, we first show the value of this approach in understanding normative brain development across diverse human environments. We then highlight its application to educational and social policy, explore pitfalls and ethical considerations, and offer practical solutions to conducting strength-based research responsibly. Our paper re-ignites old and recent calls for a strength-based paradigm shift, with a focus on its application to developmental cognitive neuroscience. We also offer a unique perspective from a new generation of early-career researchers engaged in this work, several of whom themselves have grown up in conditions of poverty. Ultimately, we argue that a balanced strength-based scientific approach will be essential to building more effective policies.

Indexed as

BrainChild DevelopmentCognitionPovertyPublic PolicyChildHumansChild povertyNeurocognitive developmentPolicyStrength-based approach

Identifiers

PMID38608359
PMCPMC11019102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.