Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38608191›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2024

Identification and classification of pulp calcifications in posterior teeth according to dental condition using digital panoramic radiography and cone beam CT.

Poliana Santos Gonçalves, Amanda Pelegrin Candemil, Igor Bassi Ferreira Petean, Alice Correa Silva-Sousa, Cassiano Ricardo Ferreira Pires, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Poliana Santos GonçalvesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Amanda Pelegrin CandemilDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Igor Bassi Ferreira PeteanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Alice Correa Silva-SousaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Cassiano Ricardo Ferreira PiresDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Jardel Francisco Mazzi-ChavesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Manoel Damião Sousa-NetoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Hugo Gaêta-AraujoDepartment of Stomatology, Public Health, and Forensic Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

CAPES - Finance Code 001Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare digital panoramic radiography (DPR) and cone beam CT (CBCT) in the detection and classification of pulp calcifications in posterior teeth in relation to tooth condition and its location.

methodsTwo hundred and fifty patients with simultaneous DPR and CBCT scans were selected from a dental image bank. For each posterior tooth, its condition was registered (healthy, restored, or decayed). The presence of calcifications was assessed and classified according to location (coronal or radicular) and type (total obliteration, partial obliteration, narrowing, and no calcification). Chi-square and McNemar tests were used to compare DPR and CBCT results, with a significance level of 5%. DPR diagnostic values were calculated using CBCT as reference.

resultsDecayed and restored teeth showed a significantly (P < .001) higher prevalence of pulp calcifications than healthy teeth in both imaging exams. There was a significant discrepancy between the imaging modalities in the identification of calcifications (P < .001), especially for radicular calcifications of maxillary teeth (DPR = 55.2%; CBCT = 30.9%). In the case of coronal calcifications, there was a greater discrepancy between CBCT and DPR in the mandibular teeth (10.7%) than in the maxillary teeth (7.7%). Overall, DPR presents higher sensitivity (0.855) than specificity (0.483) for pulp calcifications detection.

conclusionDPR considerably overestimates pulp calcifications in posterior teeth, as compared to CBCT. A higher prevalence of pulp calcifications is related to decayed and restored teeth.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Pulp CalcificationRadiography, Dental, DigitalRadiography, PanoramicAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolarcone beam computed tomographydigital panoramic radiographyposterior teethpulp calcifications

Identifiers

PMID38608191
PMCPMC11211681
OpenAlexW4394742435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.