ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Effect of tokenization on transformers for biological sequences.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing protein tokenization: reduced amino acid alphabets for efficient and accurate protein language models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Building genomic data structures from compressed representations using prefix-free parsing.Genome research · 2026Review
- A survey on large language models in biology and chemistry.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- AI for scientific discovery is a social problem.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Optimizing genomic language models for promoter prediction: a comparative study of tokenization and cross-species learning.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Protein Language Models: Applications and Perspectives.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
- A comprehensive survey of genome language models in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Deep learning application for genomic data analysis.BMB reports · 2026Review
- The transformative impact of AI-enabled AlphaFold 3: evolution, current status, and future prospects in structural biology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Architectural good practices for reproducible benchmarking in protein machine learning.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The impact of tokenizer selection in genomic language models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.Research square · 2025Article
- Bridging artificial intelligence and biological sciences: a comprehensive review of large language models in bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Fluctuation structure predicts genome-wide perturbation outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Deciphering genomic codes using advanced natural language processing techniques: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Large language models in clinical nutrition: an overview of its applications, capabilities, limitations, and potential future prospects.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Conditional generation of real antigen-specific T cell receptor sequences.Nature machine intelligence · 2025Article
- BetaAlign: a deep learning approach for multiple sequence alignment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationDeep-learning models are transforming biological research, including many bioinformatics and comparative genomics algorithms, such as sequence alignments, phylogenetic tree inference, and automatic classification of protein functions. Among these deep-learning algorithms, models for processing natural languages, developed in the natural language processing (NLP) community, were recently applied to biological sequences. However, biological sequences are different from natural languages, such as English, and French, in which segmentation of the text to separate words is relatively straightforward. Moreover, biological sequences are characterized by extremely long sentences, which hamper their processing by current machine-learning models, notably the transformer architecture. In NLP, one of the first processing steps is to transform the raw text to a list of tokens. Deep-learning applications to biological sequence data mostly segment proteins and DNA to single characters. In this work, we study the effect of alternative tokenization algorithms on eight different tasks in biology, from predicting the function of proteins and their stability, through nucleotide sequence alignment, to classifying proteins to specific families.
resultsWe demonstrate that applying alternative tokenization algorithms can increase accuracy and at the same time, substantially reduce the input length compared to the trivial tokenizer in which each character is a token. Furthermore, applying these tokenization algorithms allows interpreting trained models, taking into account dependencies among positions. Finally, we trained these tokenizers on a large dataset of protein sequences containing more than 400 billion amino acids, which resulted in over a 3-fold decrease in the number of tokens. We then tested these tokenizers trained on large-scale data on the above specific tasks and showed that for some tasks it is highly beneficial to train database-specific tokenizers. Our study suggests that tokenizers are likely to be a critical component in future deep-network analysis of biological sequence data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code, data, and trained tokenizers are available on https://github.com/technion-cs-nlp/BiologicalTokenizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.