Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38607855›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of intelligent systems2022

Using self-organising maps to predict and contain natural disasters and pandemics.

Raymond Moodley, Francisco Chiclana, Fabio Caraffini, Mario Gongora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of intelligent systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raymond MoodleyInstitute of Artificial Itelligence, School of Computer Science and Informatics De Montfort University Leicester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-2272
Francisco ChiclanaInstitute of Artificial Itelligence, School of Computer Science and Informatics De Montfort University Leicester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-4210
Fabio CaraffiniInstitute of Artificial Itelligence, School of Computer Science and Informatics De Montfort University Leicester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-7368
Mario GongoraInstitute of Artificial Itelligence, School of Computer Science and Informatics De Montfort University Leicester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-2092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unfolding coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the global need for robust predictive and containment tools and strategies. COVID-19 continues to cause widespread economic and social turmoil, and while the current focus is on both minimising the spread of the disease and deploying a range of vaccines to save lives, attention will soon turn to future proofing. In line with this, this paper proposes a prediction and containment model that could be used for pandemics and natural disasters. It combines selective lockdowns and protective cordons to rapidly contain the hazard while allowing minimally impacted local communities to conduct "business as usual" and/or offer support to highly impacted areas. A flexible, easy to use data analytics model, based on Self Organising Maps, is developed to facilitate easy decision making by governments and organisations. Comparative tests using publicly available data for Great Britain (GB) show that through the use of the proposed prediction and containment strategy, it is possible to reduce the peak infection rate, while keeping several regions (up to 25% of GB parliamentary constituencies) economically active within protective cordons.

Indexed as

epidemiologypandemic and natural disaster containmentpredicting pandemicsprotective cordonsself organising maps

Identifiers

PMID38607855
PMCPMC8242463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.