Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38607660›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

Application of AI in Multilevel Pain Assessment Using Facial Images: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jian Huo, Yan Yu, Wei Lin, Anmin Hu, Chaoran Wu

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital Pain Assessment: Patient and Family Perspectives.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jian Huo *Boston Intelligent Medical Research Center, Shenzhen United Scheme Technology Company Limited, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-8968-7204
Yan Yu *Department of Anesthesia, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8823-4219
Wei LinShenzhen United Scheme Technology Company Limited, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0009-0006-4366-6787
Anmin HuDepartment of Anesthesia, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6507-6423
Chaoran WuDepartment of Anesthesia, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0009-0003-5193-7813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe continuous monitoring and recording of patients' pain status is a major problem in current research on postoperative pain management. In the large number of original or review articles focusing on different approaches for pain assessment, many researchers have investigated how computer vision (CV) can help by capturing facial expressions. However, there is a lack of proper comparison of results between studies to identify current research gaps.

objectiveThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence models for multilevel pain assessment from facial images.

methodsThe PubMed, Embase, IEEE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for related publications before September 30, 2023. Studies that used facial images alone to estimate multiple pain values were included in the systematic review. A study quality assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, 2nd edition tool. The performance of these studies was assessed by metrics including sensitivity, specificity, log diagnostic odds ratio (LDOR), and area under the curve (AUC). The intermodal variability was assessed and presented by forest plots.

resultsA total of 45 reports were included in the systematic review. The reported test accuracies ranged from 0.27-0.99, and the other metrics, including the mean standard error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), ranged from 0.31-4.61, 0.24-2.8, 0.19-0.83, and 0.48-0.92, respectively. In total, 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Their combined sensitivity was 98% (95% CI 96%-99%), specificity was 98% (95% CI 97%-99%), LDOR was 7.99 (95% CI 6.73-9.31), and AUC was 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-1). The subgroup analysis showed that the diagnostic performance was acceptable, although imbalanced data were still emphasized as a major problem. All studies had at least one domain with a high risk of bias, and for 20% (9/45) of studies, there were no applicability concerns.

conclusionsThis review summarizes recent evidence in automatic multilevel pain estimation from facial expressions and compared the test accuracy of results in a meta-analysis. Promising performance for pain estimation from facial images was established by current CV algorithms. Weaknesses in current studies were also identified, suggesting that larger databases and metrics evaluating multiclass classification performance could improve future studies.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42023418181; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=418181.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceArea Under CurveHumansPainPain Measurementcomputer visionfacial imagemonitoringmultilevel pain assessmentpainpostoperativestatus

Identifiers

PMID38607660
PMCPMC11053395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.