ArticleJournal of vision2024
Asymmetries between achromatic increments and decrements: Perceptual scales and discrimination thresholds.
Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dependence of brightness induction on the contrast polarity of a disk-annulus stimulus.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The perceptual response to achromatic incremental (A+) and decremental (A-) visual stimuli is known to be asymmetrical, due most likely to differences between ON and OFF channels. In the current study, we further investigated this asymmetry psychophysically. In Experiment 1, maximum likelihood difference scaling (MLDS) was used to estimate separately observers' perceptual scales for A+ and A-. In Experiment 2, observers performed two spatial alternative forced choice (2SAFC) pedestal discrimination on multiple pedestal contrast levels, using all combinations of A+ and A- pedestals and tests. Both experiments showed the well-known asymmetry. The perceptual scale curves of A+ follow a modified Naka-Rushton equation, whereas those of A- follow a cubic function. Correspondingly, the discrimination thresholds for the A+ pedestal increased monotonically with pedestal contrast, whereas the thresholds of the A- pedestal first increased as the pedestal contrast increased, then decreased as the contrast became higher. We propose a model that links the results of the two experiments, in which the pedestal discrimination threshold is inversely related to the derivative of the perceptual scale curve. Our findings generally agree with Whittle's previous findings (Whittle, 1986, 1992), which also included strong asymmetry between A+ and A-. We suggest that the perception of achromatic balanced incremental and decremental (bipolar) stimuli, such as gratings or flicker, might be dominated by one polarity due to this asymmetry under some conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.