Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38607625›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Incidence and Presenting Characteristics of Angiosarcoma in the US, 2001-2020.

Michael J Wagner, Vinod Ravi, Stephanie K Schaub, Ed Y Kim, Jeremy Sharib, Harveshp Mogal, Min Park, Michaela Tsai, Daniela Duarte-Bateman, Anthony Tufaro and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multimodality treatment and survival in primary cardiac malignancies: evidence from competing-risk and machine learning analyses.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. When a haematoma is not a haematoma.Skin health and disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J WagnerClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Vinod RaviDepartment of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Stephanie K SchaubDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Ed Y KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jeremy SharibDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Harveshp MogalDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Min ParkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Providence-Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Michaela TsaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Providence-Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Daniela Duarte-BatemanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Anthony TufaroDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Elizabeth T LoggersClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Lee D CranmerClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Bonny ChauDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Michael J HassettDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Juneko Grilley-OlsonDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Kelly G PaulsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Providence-Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · USCleveland Clinic · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USHarvard University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Angiosarcoma is an aggressive vascular malignant neoplasm presenting either as a primary or secondary cancer, often arising after radiotherapy or in the context of preexisting lymphedema. Comprehensive data describing its incidence and presentation patterns are needed. Objective: To describe the incidence, presenting characteristics, and change over time of angiosarcoma in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study used data from the US Cancer Statistics (USCS) National Program of Cancer Registries-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Combined Database, which captures more than 99% of newly diagnosed cancers in the US. The study included all 19 289 patients in the US with a new diagnosis of angiosarcoma between 2001 and 2020 captured in the USCS database. Statistical analysis was performed from June to September 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of angiosarcoma, demographics of patients with angiosarcoma, and extent of disease at presentation. Results: The study included 19 289 patients (median age, 71 years [IQR, 59-80 years]; 10 506 women [54.5%]) with a new diagnosis of angiosarcoma. The US incidence of angiosarcoma doubled between 2001 (657 cases) and 2019 (1312 cases), reflecting both an increase in the adjusted incidence rate of 1.6% per year (P = .001), to 3.3 cases per 1 000 000 person-years (95% CI, 3.1-3.5 cases per 1 000 000 person-years), and an increase in the population at risk. In 2020, the reported incidence rate (3.0 cases per 1 000 000 person-years) and cases of angiosarcoma (n = 1159) were modestly lower than in 2019. Overall, 72.3% of cases of angiosarcoma (n = 13 955) were cutaneous, subcutaneous, or breast angiosarcomas; 24.4% were visceral (n = 4701); and 3.3% were located in unknown or rare primary sites (n = 633). Secondary breast and chest wall angiosarcomas among women represented the largest contribution to increasing incidence. Among breast angiosarcomas, 99.2% (2684 of 2705) were in women and 71.9% (1944 of 2705) were secondary. A total of 80.4% of chest wall or thorax cases among women (1861 of 2316) were secondary vs 26.5% among men (112 of 422), and 63.9% of upper extremity cases among women (205 of 321) were secondary vs 26.8% (56 of 209) among men (P = .001). Rates of secondary angiosarcoma in the abdomen and lower extremities were similar between men and women. The incidence rate of visceral angiosarcoma was also found to be increasing (1.5% per year; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study describes angiosarcoma presentation patterns and incidence rates in the US over a 20-year period and shows that the number of cases in men and women increased, with the greatest increase among women with secondary angiosarcoma of the chest, breast, and upper extremity. These data increase awareness of a rare but highly morbid disease and highlight the need for improved early detection of angiosarcoma among patients at high risk, such as women with a history of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHemangiosarcomaAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38607625
PMCPMC11015348
OpenAlexW4394766733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.