Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38607590›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2024

Diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with thyroid cancer: a retrospective study of 1478 patients.

Qingxin Zeng, Haifeng Zhong, Hui Rao, Yuedong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qingxin ZengDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital)/Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 63, Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, China.
Haifeng ZhongDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital)/Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 63, Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, China.
Hui RaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital)/Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, Meizhou, China.
Yuedong WangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital (Huangtang Hospital)/Meizhou Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 63, Huangtang Road, Meijiang District, Meizhou, 514031, China. wangyuedong2015715@126.com.

Funding

Scientific Research Cultivation Project of Meizhou People's Hospital No. PY-C2020032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor cell (CTC) detection is one form of liquid biopsy. It is a novel technique that is beginning to be applied in the field of thyroid cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic value of CTCs in patients with thyroid cancer.

methodsA total of 1478 patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into malignant group (n = 747) and benign group (n = 731). Peripheral blood was collected, and CTCs were enriched and quantified before surgery. The baseline data of the two groups were matched by Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of different indicators for thyroid cancer. The malignant group before PSM was further divided into subgroups according to the BRAF V600E mutation and lymphatic metastasis (N stage), and the number of CTCs in different subgroups was compared.

resultsAfter 1:1 PSM, baseline characteristics of the malignant group and benign group were matched and assigned 315 cases in each group. The number of CTCs and the TPOAb values were comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05). The TgAb values [1.890 (1.110 - 16.010) vs 1.645 (1.030 - 7.073) IU/mL, p = 0.049] were significantly higher in the malignant group than in the benign group. After PSM, ROC analyses showed that the areas under the curve (AUCs) of CTC, TgAb and ultrasound were 0.537 (sensitivity 65.6%, specificity 45.8%), 0.546 (sensitivity 40.0%, specificity 70.8%) and 0.705 (sensitivity 77.1%, specificity 63.2%), respectively. The AUCs of the combined detection of 'CTC + ultrasound' (combine 1) and the combined detection of 'CTC + TgAb + ultrasound' (combine 2) were 0.718 (sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 61.7%) and 0.724 (sensitivity 78.0%, specificity 63.3%), respectively. The AUC of ultrasound was significantly higher than CTC (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in AUC between combination 1 and ultrasound, and between combination 2 and ultrasound (p > 0.05). The number of CTCs between the N0 and N1 subgroups, and between the BRAF mutant and BRAF wild subgroups was comparable (p > 0.05).

conclusionsAs an emerging and noninvasive testing tool, the efficacy of CTCs in diagnosing thyroid cancer is limited.

Indexed as

BRAF V600ECirculating tumor cellsLiquid biopsyThyroid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38607590
PMCPMC11014821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.