Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38607521›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2024

COVID-19 Vaccines and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: The Impact of Media Attention on Reporting to EudraVigilance.

María Gordillo-Marañón, Agnieszka Szmigiel, Vladimíra Yalmanová, Irina Caplanusi, Georgy Genov, David Benee Olsen, Sabine Straus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Gordillo-Marañón *Data Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2993-6577
Agnieszka Szmigiel *Pharmacovigilance Office, European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. agnieszka.szmigiel@ema.europa.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6049-9634
Vladimíra YalmanováStakeholders and Communication, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4947-0479
Irina CaplanusiPharmacovigilance Office, European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0694-4469
Georgy GenovPharmacovigilance Office, European Medicines Agency, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5139-3981
David Benee OlsenDepartment of Pharmacovigilance, Norwegian Medical Products Agency, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7117-8182
Sabine StrausMedicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9266-3312

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDuring the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, over 34,000 reports of heavy menstrual bleeding following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines originating in the Economic European Area were submitted to EudraVigilance, the European Union database of suspected adverse drug reactions. More than 90% of these reports were sent by consumers while the remaining by healthcare professionals. Public concerns regarding menstruation disorders in COVID-19 vaccinees were also covered by the media. We investigated the impact of media attention on the reporting trends of heavy menstrual bleeding to EudraVigilance.

methodsWe used media outlets published in the Economic European Area on menstrual disorders and COVID-19 vaccines from the beginning of the vaccination campaign in the Economic European Area (1 January, 2021) until December 2022 (i.e., after the regulatory request to add the adverse event to the product information) and spontaneous reports from EudraVigilance.

resultsWe found that the publication of safety updates from regulatory authorities and subsequent coverage in media outlets preceded increased reporting to EudraVigilance. Furthermore, the heavy menstrual bleeding reported in the cases occurred several weeks or months earlier and were not submitted to the respective date. The analysis suggests that the spikes in reporting of heavy menstrual bleeding were to some extent influenced by media coverage in some countries.

conclusionsConsumer reporting to the European Union spontaneous data collection system, EudraVigilance, was of high value for regulatory safety reviews, albeit the reporting behaviours were not free of the influence of the media. These sources of information can be investigated to understand the context of safety concerns of public health interest.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMenorrhagiaDatabases, FactualEuropean UnionFemaleHumansMass MediaPharmacovigilanceCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38607521
PMCPMC11286647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.