Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38607501›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2024

Examining confidential wholesale margin estimates in European countries for the price negotiation of patented drugs in Germany: a statistical model.

Iris An der Heiden, Guido Schiffhorst, Laura Müller, Martin Albrecht, Arne Bartol, Stefanie Wiberny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iris An der HeidenIGES Institute GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Guido SchiffhorstIGES Institute GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Laura MüllerHealth Economics, Market Access & Reimbursement, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany.
Martin AlbrechtIGES Institute GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Arne BartolHealth Economics, Market Access & Reimbursement, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0321-2482
Stefanie WibernyHealth Economics, Market Access & Reimbursement, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany. swiberny@its.jnj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5663-8378

Funding

Janssen-Cilag GmbH commissioning with costsJanssen-Cilag GmbH Through salary
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on the legal framework laid down in section 130b (9) of Book V of the German Social Code, various criteria are relevant for the negotiated price for new patented drugs in Germany. European reference prices (ERPs) are one criterion. The ERP is based on the ex-factory prices (EFPs) of the countries included in the European country basket. However, in some of these countries, the EFP is not published due to confidential wholesale margins. Wholesale margins must therefore be estimated and deducted from purchase prices. In this context literature-based estimates to date do not assume regressive margins with higher pharmaceutical prices. This assumption is questionable and can lead to systematically underestimated country prices, especially for high-priced drugs. Percentage wholesale margins in the majority of European countries develop to a comparable extent regressively with increasing prices. It should therefore be examined (1) whether statistical models can predict the margins of individual countries, in principle and especially for countries where margins are unknown and regressive trends are likely, and (2) to what extent the estimation of margins improves when regressive statistical models are used to estimate margins instead of cross-price averages published in the literature.

methodsQualitative preliminary research explores the basic wholesale pricing mechanisms in countries with confidential wholesale margins. Wholesale margins for reimbursable drugs were then modeled for regulated European countries. Estimation quality and impact of the model was compared to estimations based on average margins.

resultsIn both regulated countries and in countries with confidential wholesale margins, percentage margins of wholesalers develop regressively as drug prices rise. Regressive courses of margins can be resiliently modeled for the regulated countries using a power distribution with significantly lower mean squared errors in a linear mixed model in comparison to literature-based estimations with country-specific cross-price averages.

conclusionIf there is reason to believe that margins are regressive, confidential wholesale margins are expected to be better estimated by the power function based on margins of regulated countries than by the published country-specific average margins, reducing significantly inaccurate effects on margin estimations of high-price drugs.

Indexed as

AMNOGBenefit assessmentDrugsEstimation methodEuropean pharmaceutical pricesEx-factory pricesExternal reference pricingInternational reference pricingPrice negotiationStatistical modelWholesale margins

Identifiers

PMID38607501
PMCPMC11010283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.