Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38607387›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

ARTIS Pheno®: a potential tool for cochlear implant surgery.

S Schmidt, M Tisch, K Bahr-Hamm, C Matthias, D Overhoff, S Waldeck

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S SchmidtDepartment of Otolaryngology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany. drsandraschmidt@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2306-6251
M TischDepartment of Otolaryngology, Bundeswehr Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
K Bahr-HammDepartment of Otolaryngology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.
C MatthiasDepartment of Otolaryngology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Centre, Mainz, Germany.
D OverhoffDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
S WaldeckDepartment of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEBundeswehrkrankenhaus · DEFederal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCochlear implantation is a standard approach to hearing rehabilitation and encompasses three main stages: appropriate patient selection, a challenging surgical procedure, which should be as atraumatic as possible and preserve cochlear structures, and lifelong postoperative follow-up. Computed tomography (CT) is performed to assess postoperative implant position. The Siemens Advanced Radar Target Identification System (ARTIS) Pheno provides fluoroscopic imaging during surgery and has so far been mainly used by cardiologists, neurosurgeons and trauma surgeons.

methodsSix patients with difficult anatomy or a challenging medical history were selected for a surgical procedure, during which we planned to use the ARTIS Pheno to accurately position and assess implant position under fluoroscopy during and immediately after surgery. In all six cases, the ARTIS Pheno was used directly in the surgical setting. The procedures were performed in cooperation with the neuroradiology department in an interdisciplinary manner.

resultsIn all six patients, fluoroscopy was used to visualise the procedure at different stages of surgery. In five patients, the procedure was successfully completed. This approach allowed us to finally assess implant position and confirm the correct and complete insertion of the electrode while the patient was still under anaesthesia.

conclusionThese cases showed positive surgical outcomes. Although the procedure is more complex than a standard approach, patients can be managed in a safe, effective and appropriate manner. The assessment of implant position in real time during surgery leads to greater patient and surgeon satisfaction. The approach presented here ensures a high quality of cochlear implant surgery even in difficult surgical situations and meets the requirements of modern surgery.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedCochlear ImplantsFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurgery, Computer-AssistedARTIS PhenoCochlear implantationHigh quality of carePetrous bone abnormalitiesQuality control

Identifiers

PMID38607387
PMCPMC11266224
OpenAlexW4394734816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.