ReviewGlobal health action2024
Embedding research capacity strengthening in multi-country studies in low-and middle-income countries: learnings from sexual and reproductive health research.
Review in Global health action, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- US jail and prison institutional research policies: a lever in access to research for incarcerated people.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Trainee experiences of a qualitative research training programme for young women in Kenya: a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Global integration, local constraints: how internationalized scientific development shapes early-career research in Latin America.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Determinants of collaboration dynamics and challenges in North-South data-driven health research in the African context: an epistemic injustice perspective.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Embedding research capacity strengthening in multicountry sexual health research.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Impact of a comprehensive two-year research capacity intervention with sexual and reproductive health researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Creating different global health futures: mapping the health research ecosystem and taking decolonial action.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Strengthening research capacity in Cameroon: qualitative insights on the impact of mentorship, training and funding on receiving seed grants.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Research capacity strengthening methods and meanings: negotiating power in a global health programme on violence against women.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research capacity strengthening (RCS) can empower individuals, institutions, networks, or countries to define and prioritize problems systematically; develop and scientifically evaluate appropriate solutions; and reinforce or improve capacities to translate knowledge into policy and practice. However, how to embed RCS into multi-country studies focusing on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) is largely undocumented. We used findings from a qualitative study, from a review of the literature, and from a validation exercise from a panel of experts from research institutions that work on SRHR RCS. We provide a framework for embedded RCS; suggest a set of seven concrete actions that research project planners, designers, implementers, and funders can utilise to guide embedded RCS activities in low- and middle-income countries; and present a practical checklist for planning and assessing embedded RCS in research projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.