ArticleCells2024
Controlling Recombination to Evolve Bacteriophages.
Article in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Density-Based Methods in Phage Biology: Titering, Lysis Timing, Host Range, and Phage-Resistance Evolution.Viruses · 2025Review
- Bacteriophage-Based Approach Against Biofilm Infections Associated with Medical Devices: A Narrative Review of ESKAPE Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Isolation of phages infecting the zoonotic pathogenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Bacteriophage titering by optical density means: KOTE assays.Open life sciences · 2025Review
- Mathematical comparison of protocols for adapting a bacteriophage to a new host.Virus evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recombination among different phages sometimes facilitates their ability to grow on new hosts. Protocols to direct the evolution of phage host range, as might be used in the application of phage therapy, would then benefit from including steps to enable recombination. Applying mathematical and computational models, in addition to experiments using phages T3 and T7, we consider ways that a protocol may influence recombination levels. We first address coinfection, which is the first step to enabling recombination. The multiplicity of infection (MOI, the ratio of phage to cell concentration) is insufficient for predicting (co)infection levels. The force of infection (the rate at which cells are infected) is also critical but is more challenging to measure. Using both a high force of infection and high MOI (>1) for the different phages ensures high levels of coinfection. We also apply a four-genetic-locus model to study protocol effects on recombinant levels. Recombinants accumulate over multiple generations of phage growth, less so if one phage outgrows the other. Supplementing the phage pool with the low-fitness phage recovers some of this 'lost' recombination. Overall, fine tuning of phage recombination rates will not be practical with wild phages, but qualitative enhancement can be attained with some basic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.