Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606986›Full record

Trial reportStem cells translational medicine2024

Nasal septum-derived chondroprogenitor cells control mandibular condylar resorption consequent to orthognathic surgery: a clinical trial.

Ricardo de Souza Tesch, Esther Rieko Takamori, Karla Menezes, Rosana Bizon Vieira Carias, Carmen Lucia Kuniyoshi Rebelatto, Alexandra Cristina Senegaglia, Debora Regina Daga, Leticia Fracaro, Anny Waloski Robert, Carlos Bruno Reis Pinheiro and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cells translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mastication-Induced Electrical Stimulation Activates Prg4Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ricardo de Souza TeschRegenerative Medicine Laboratory, Petrópolis Medical School/ UNIFASE, Avenida Barão do Rio Branco 1003, Centro, Petrópolis, RJ 25680-120, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-0981
Esther Rieko TakamoriRegenerative Medicine Laboratory, Petrópolis Medical School/ UNIFASE, Avenida Barão do Rio Branco 1003, Centro, Petrópolis, RJ 25680-120, Brazil.
Karla MenezesInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Ave. Carlos Chagas Filho 373, Sala B1-011, Cidade Universitária, Ilha Do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-590, Brazil.
Rosana Bizon Vieira CariasRegenerative Medicine Laboratory, Petrópolis Medical School/ UNIFASE, Avenida Barão do Rio Branco 1003, Centro, Petrópolis, RJ 25680-120, Brazil.
Carmen Lucia Kuniyoshi RebelattoCore for Cell Technology, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR 80215-901, Brazil.
Alexandra Cristina SenegagliaCore for Cell Technology, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR 80215-901, Brazil.
Debora Regina DagaCore for Cell Technology, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR 80215-901, Brazil.
Leticia FracaroCore for Cell Technology, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR 80215-901, Brazil.
Anny Waloski RobertStem Cells Basic Biology Laboratory, Carlos Chagas Institute - FIOCRUZ/PR, Rua Professor Algacyr Munhoz Mader, 3775, Curitiba, PR, 81350-010, Brazil.
Carlos Bruno Reis PinheiroPostgraduate Program in Exercise and Sport Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20550-013, Brazil.
Marcelo de Freitas AguiarDepartment of Specific Formation, School of Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Rua Dr. Silvio Henrique Braune, 22, Nova Friburgo, RJ, 28625-650, Brazil.
Pablo Javier BlancoDepartment of Mathematical and Computational Models, National Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Avenida Getúlio Vargas, 333, Petrópolis, RJ, 25651-075, Brazil.
Eduardo Guerreiro ZilvesDepartment of Mathematical and Computational Models, National Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Avenida Getúlio Vargas, 333, Petrópolis, RJ, 25651-075, Brazil.
Paulo Roberto Slud BrofmanCore for Cell Technology, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR 80215-901, Brazil.
Radovan BorojevicRegenerative Medicine Laboratory, Petrópolis Medical School/ UNIFASE, Avenida Barão do Rio Branco 1003, Centro, Petrópolis, RJ 25680-120, Brazil.
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRFaculdade de Medicina de Petrópolis · BRLaboratório Nacional de Computação Científica · BRFundação Carlos Chagas · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

Octacilio Gualberto Foundation (FOG)Rio de Janeiro State Research Support Foundation (FAPERJ) E-26/ 111.301/2013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Condylar resorption is an aggressive and disability form of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) degenerative disease, usually non-respondent to conservative or minimally invasive therapies and often leading to surgical intervention and prostheses implantation. This condition is also one of the most dreaded postoperative complications of orthognathic surgery, with severe cartilage erosion and loss of subchondral bone volume and mineral density, associated with a painful or not inflammatory processes. Because regenerative medicine has emerged as an alternative for orthopedic cases with advanced degenerative joint disease, we conducted a phase I/IIa clinical trial (U1111-1194-6997) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous nasal septal chondroprogenitor cells. Ten participants underwent biopsy of the nasal septum cartilage during their orthognathic surgery. The harvested cells were cultured in vitro and analyzed for viability, presence of phenotype markers for mesenchymal stem and/or chondroprogenitor cells, and the potential to differentiate into chondrocytes, adipocytes, and osteoblasts. After the intra-articular injection of the cell therapy, clinical follow-up was performed using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and computed tomography (CT) images. No serious adverse events related to the cell therapy injection were observed during the 12-month follow-up period. It was found that autologous chondroprogenitors reduced arthralgia, promoted stabilization of mandibular function and condylar volume, and regeneration of condylar tissues. This study demonstrates that chondroprogenitor cells from the nasal septum may be a promise strategy for the treatment of temporomandibular degenerative joint disease that do not respond to other conservative therapies.

Indexed as

Mandibular CondyleNasal SeptumAdultBone ResorptionCell DifferentiationChondrocytesFemaleHumansMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsOrthognathic SurgeryTemporomandibular Joint Disorderscellular therapyclinical translationalprogenitor cellsskeleton

Identifiers

PMID38606986
PMCPMC11227969
OpenAlexW4394735415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.