Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38606788›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health

Approaches to Engaging Men During Primary Healthcare Encounters: A scoping review.

Zac E Seidler, Ruben Benakovic, Michael J Wilson, Margaret A McGee, Krista Fisher, James A Smith, John L Oliffe, Michelle Sheldrake

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Men and type 2 diabetes: how everyday knowledge remains unshared in gendered medical encounters.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zac E SeidlerMovember, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6854-1554
Ruben BenakovicOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael J WilsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8983-0067
Margaret A McGeeMovember, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Krista FisherOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
James A SmithRural and Remote Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
John L OliffeSchool of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9029-4003
Michelle SheldrakeMovember, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUMovember Foundation · AUFlinders University · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender-responsive healthcare is critical to advancing men's health given that masculinities intersect with other social determinants to impact help-seeking, engagement with primary healthcare, and patient outcomes. A scoping review was undertaken with the aim to synthesize gender-responsive approaches used by healthcare providers (HCPs) to engage men with primary healthcare. MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases were searched for articles published between 2000 and February 2024. Titles and abstracts for 15,659 citations were reviewed, and 97 articles met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed thematically. Thirty-three approaches were synthesized from across counseling/psychology, general practice, social work, nursing, psychiatry, pharmacy, and unspecified primary healthcare settings. These were organized into three interrelated themes: (a) tailoring communication to reach men; (b) purposefully structuring treatment to meet men's health needs, and (c) centering the therapeutic alliance to retain men in care. Strength-based and asset-building approaches focused on reading and responding to a diversity of masculinities was reinforced across the three findings. While these approaches are recommended for the judicious integration into health practitioner education and practice, this review highlighted that the evidence remains underdeveloped, particularly for men who experience health inequities. Critical priorities for further research include intersectional considerations and operationalizing gender-responsive healthcare approaches for men and its outcomes, particularly at first point-of-contact encounters.

Indexed as

MasculinityMen's HealthCommunicationHealth PersonnelHumansMalePrimary Health Carealliancedoctor-patientengagementmenprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID38606788
PMCPMC11010769
OpenAlexW4394751800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.